Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension via the natural vaginal cavity (SvNOTES) for pelvic prolapse: The first feasibility study.
Lyu, Yuanyuan; Ding, Huafeng; Ding, Jin; Luo, Yonghong; Guan, Xiaoming; Ni, Guantai.
Afiliação
  • Lyu Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
  • Ding H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Ding J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
  • Luo Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
  • Guan X; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
  • Ni G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Surg ; 9: 911553, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35923438
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and short-term efficacy of single-port laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal natural cavity endoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspensions (SvNOTES).

Methods:

A total of 30 patients diagnosed with anterior or/and middle pelvic organ prolapse Stages III and IV underwent natural vaginal cavity (SvNOTES), and 30 patients who underwent conventional sacrospinous ligament (SSLF) were used as a control group. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative POP-Q score, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results:

The operation time for SvNOTE was (60 ± 13) min, which was longer than (30 ± 15) min for SSLF (P = 0.04). However, the bleeding amount in SvNOTE was 29.44 ± 2.56, significantly lower than that in the SSLF group (80 ± 10; P = 0.02), and the postoperative hospital stay in the SvNOTE group was (4 ± 2) days, longer than (3 ± 1) days in SSLF (P = 0.02). However, there were no intraoperative complications in the SvNOTE group, whereas one ureteral injury occurred in the SSLF group; in addition, the postoperative POP-Q score was significantly better in the SvNOTE group than that in the SSLF group with increasing time (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Compared with SSLF, single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension via the natural vaginal cavity is visualized, greatly improving the success rate of sacrospinous ligament fixation, with less blood loss and fewer complications, arguably a safer and minimally invasive surgical approach.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China