Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Child and family-focused interventions for child maltreatment and domestic abuse: development of core outcome sets.
Powell, Claire; Feder, Gene; Gilbert, Ruth; Paulauskaite, Laura; Szilassy, Eszter; Woodman, Jenny; Howarth, Emma.
Afiliação
  • Powell C; Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK c.powell@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Feder G; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol University, Bristol, UK.
  • Gilbert R; Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
  • Paulauskaite L; Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK.
  • Szilassy E; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Woodman J; Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK.
  • Howarth E; School of Psychology, University of East London, London, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e064397, 2022 09 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36123087
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The current evidence for child maltreatment (CM) and domestic violence and abuse (DVA) interventions is limited by the diversity of outcomes evaluated and the variety of measures used. The result is studies that are difficult to compare and lack focus on outcomes reflecting service user or provider priorities.

OBJECTIVE:

To develop core outcome sets (COSs) for evaluations of child and family-focused interventions for (1) CM and (2) DVA.

DESIGN:

We conducted a two-stage consensus process. Stage 1 a long list of candidate outcomes across CM and DVA was developed through rapid systematic reviews of intervention studies, qualitative and grey literature; stakeholder workshops; survivor interviews. Stage 2 three-panel, three-round e-Delphi surveys for CM and DVA with consensus meetings to agree with the final COSs.

PARTICIPANTS:

287 stakeholders participated in at least one stage of the process (ie, either CM or DVA COS development) workshops (n=76), two e-Delphi surveys (n=170) and consensus meetings (n=43). Stakeholders included CM and DVA survivors, practitioners, commissioners, policymakers and researchers.

RESULTS:

Stage 1 identified 335 outcomes categorised into 9 areas and 39 domains. Following stage 2, the final five outcomes included in the CM-COS were child emotional health and well-being; child's trusted relationships; feelings of safety; child abuse and neglect; service harms. The final five outcomes in the DVA-COS were child emotional health and well-being; caregiver emotional health and well-being; family relationships; freedom to go about daily life; feelings of safety.

CONCLUSIONS:

We developed two COSs for CM and DVA with two common outcomes (child emotional health and well-being; feelings of safety). The COSs reflect shared priorities among service users, providers and researchers. Use of these COSs across trials and service evaluations for children and families affected by CM and DVA will make outcome selection more consistent and help harmonise research and practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maus-Tratos Infantis / Violência Doméstica Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Maus-Tratos Infantis / Violência Doméstica Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido