Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia technique combined with general anesthesia on intraabdominal volume during gynecological laparoscopy.
Kizilet, Hakan; Cömert, Ercan; Taflan, Sener; Dogan, Ozan; Besir, Ahmet; Kart, Cavit.
Afiliação
  • Kizilet H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Cömert E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adiyaman University Faculty of Medicine, Adiyaman, Turkey.
  • Taflan S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey.
  • Dogan O; Private Office, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology Specialist, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Besir A; Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Karadeniz Teknik Universitesi, School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
  • Kart C; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 48(12): 3262-3268, 2022 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36148979
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We aimed to investigate the effect of spinal anesthesia which will be performed simultaneously with general anesthesia on the site of operation with the same pressure. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

This study was conducted as a randomized, prospective clinical study on 40 patients who were randomly divided into two groups. Twenty women underwent general anesthesia (Group GA) and 20 women underwent spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia (Group SGA). For all cases, preoperative height, weight, waist circumference, body mass index (kg/m2 ), the distance between both spina iliaca anterior superior, the distance of the intersection of both ribs with an imaginary line drawn over the anterior axillary line, suprapubic bone-umbilical, umbilical-xiphoid, and suprapubic bone-xiphoid distance from the midline of the abdomen were measured. Moreover, while the patient was lying in the neutral position on the operating table, the height of the highest point of the abdomen to the operating table was also measured. These measurements were repeated at intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) 14 and 25 mmHg. The amount of intra-abdominal insufflated CO2 was also recorded at IAP 14 and 25 mmHg.

RESULTS:

When the intra-abdominal insufflation volumes of both groups were compared at 14 and 25 mmHg, respectively, there was no statistical difference (p 0.54, p 0.40). When 14 and 25 mmHg were compared in all cases, a statistically significant difference was observed in other measurements except in xiphoid-umbilical distance (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

We found that spinal anesthesia combined with GA had no effect on the abdominal volume and anthropometric measurements in laparoscopic procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Raquianestesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Laparoscopia / Raquianestesia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia