Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) mainstream or unconventional option? Study exploring the impact of COVID-19 on paediatric dentists' views and practices of MID for managing carious primary teeth in children across the United Kingdom and European Union.
BaniHani, A; Hamid, A; Van Eeckhoven, J; Gizani, S; Albadri, S.
Afiliação
  • BaniHani A; Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, The Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK. banihanialaa@gmail.com.
  • Hamid A; Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol, UK.
  • Van Eeckhoven J; School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Gizani S; Department of Paediatric Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Albadri S; School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent ; 23(5): 835-844, 2022 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315343
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To explore the techniques used to manage carious primary teeth during the COVID-19 pandemic by paediatric dentists and dentists with a special interest in paediatric dentistry (DwSI) who are members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD) and the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD), and their views on the use of minimal intervention dentistry (MID) in children prior to, during and post the COVID era.

METHODS:

A total of 212 paediatric dentists and DwSI completed an online questionnaire. Six MID techniques were explored fissure sealants, resin infiltration, Hall Technique (HT), 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF), atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), stepwise removal and selective caries removal.

RESULTS:

The majority were specialists (26%) followed by clinical academics (23.1%) working mainly in university teaching hospitals (46.2%). Routine dental treatment for children with carious primary teeth was provided by the majority (92.5%) during the pandemic. HT (96%) and 38% SDF (65.7%) were the most commonly used techniques among the BSPD members whereas conventional restoration of non-selective caries removal and pulp therapy remained the most widely used technique among the EAPD members (66.2%). Most of the MID techniques were used as a treatment option (48.1%) rather than a choice (43.4%), with most of these choices having been affected by the patient's behaviour (82.5%). More than one thirds (39.2%) of the participants were reluctant to adopt MID after the pandemic. Several barriers such as lack of teaching and confidence as well as perceived lack of evidence were identified.

CONCLUSION:

A range of MID techniques is practiced broadly by a sample of paediatric dentists and DwSI across the United Kingdom (U.K) and European Union (E.U). The majority of clinicians are willing to continue using these techniques going forward after COVID restrictions are lifted. The pandemic served as an opportunity for many dentists to become familiar with various MID practices, such as SDF, which has been already established some time ago.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cárie Dentária / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / COVID-19 Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cárie Dentária / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / COVID-19 Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido