Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Monoclonal Gammopathies of Clinical Significance: A Critical Appraisal.
Ríos-Tamayo, Rafael; Paiva, Bruno; Lahuerta, Juan José; López, Joaquín Martínez; Duarte, Rafael F.
Afiliação
  • Ríos-Tamayo R; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain.
  • Paiva B; Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
  • Lahuerta JJ; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
  • López JM; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
  • Duarte RF; Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(21)2022 Oct 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36358666
ABSTRACT
Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCSs) represent a group of diseases featuring the association of a nonmalignant B cells or plasma cells clone, the production of an M-protein, and singularly, the existence of organ damage. They present a current framework that is difficult to approach from a practical clinical perspective. Several points should be addressed in order to move further toward a better understanding. Overall, these entities are only partially included in the international classifications of diseases. Its definition and classification remain ambiguous. Remarkably, its real incidence is unknown, provided that a diagnostic biopsy is mandatory in most cases. In fact, amyloidosis AL is the final diagnosis in a large percentage of patients with renal significance. On the other hand, many of these young entities are syndromes that are based on a dynamic set of diagnostic criteria, challenging a timely diagnosis. Moreover, a specific risk score for progression is lacking. Despite the key role of the clinical laboratory in the diagnosis and prognosis of these patients, information about laboratory biomarkers is limited. Besides, the evidence accumulated for many of these entities is scarce. Hence, national and international registries are stimulated. In particular, IgM MGCS deserves special attention. Until now, therapy is far from being standardized, and it should be planned on a risk and patient-adapted basis. Finally, a comprehensive and coordinated multidisciplinary approach is needed, and specific clinical trials are encouraged.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha