Computed tomography-based radiomics machine learning classifiers to differentiate type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancers.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics for preoperatively differentiating type I and II epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) using different machine learning classifiers and to construct and validate the best diagnostic model. METHODS: A total of 470 patients with EOCs were included retrospectively. Patients were divided into a training dataset (N = 329) and a test dataset (N = 141). A total of 1316 radiomics features were extracted from the portal venous phase of contrast-enhanced CT images for each patient, followed by dimension reduction of the features. The support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), random forest (RF), naïve Bayes (NB), logistic regression (LR), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifiers were trained to obtain the radiomics signatures. The performance of each radiomics signature was evaluated and compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and relative standard deviation (RSD). The best radiomics signature was selected and combined with clinical and radiological features to establish a combined model. The diagnostic value of the combined model was assessed. RESULTS: The LR-based radiomics signature performed well in the test dataset, with an AUC of 0.879 and an accuracy of 0.773. The combined model performed best in both the training and test datasets, with AUCs of 0.900 and 0.934 and accuracies of 0.848 and 0.823, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined model showed the best diagnostic performance for distinguishing between type I and II EOCs preoperatively. Therefore, it can be a useful tool for clinical individualized EOC classification. KEY POINTS • Radiomics features extracted from computed tomography (CT) could be used to differentiate type I and II epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). • Machine learning can improve the performance of differentiating type I and II EOCs. • The combined model exhibited the best diagnostic capability over the other models in both the training and test datasets.