Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Frequencies and reasons for unplanned emergency department return visits by older adults: a cohort study.
van Loon-van Gaalen, Merel; Voshol, Ilje E; van der Linden, M Christien; Gussekloo, Jacobijn; van der Mast, Roos C.
Afiliação
  • van Loon-van Gaalen M; Emergency Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands. m.van.loon@haaglandenmc.nl.
  • Voshol IE; Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.van.loon@haaglandenmc.nl.
  • van der Linden MC; GeriCall, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Gussekloo J; Emergency Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 432, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • van der Mast RC; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 309, 2023 05 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198554
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

As unplanned Emergency Department (ED) return visits (URVs) are associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults, many EDs have initiated post-discharge interventions to reduce URVs. Unfortunately, most interventions fail to reduce URVs, including telephone follow-up after ED discharge, investigated in a recent trial. To understand why these interventions were not effective, we analyzed patient and ED visit characteristics and reasons for URVs within 30 days for patients aged ≥ 70 years.

METHODS:

Data was used from a randomized controlled trial, investigating whether telephone follow-up after ED discharge reduced URVs compared to a satisfaction survey call. Only observational data from control group patients were used. Patient and index ED visit characteristics were compared between patients with and without URVs. Two independent researchers determined the reasons for URVs and categorized them into patient-related, illness-related, new complaints and other reasons. Associations were examined between the number of URVs per patient and the categories of reasons for URVs.

RESULTS:

Of the 1659 patients, 222 (13.4%) had at least one URV within 30 days. Male sex, ED visit in the 30 days before the index ED visit, triage category "urgent", longer length of ED stay, urinary tract problems, and dyspnea were associated with URVs. Of the 222 patients with an URV, 31 (14%) returned for patient-related reasons, 95 (43%) for illness-related reasons, 76 (34%) for a new complaint and 20 (9%) for other reasons. URVs of patients who returned ≥ 3 times were mostly illness-related (72%).

CONCLUSION:

As the majority of patients had an URV for illness-related reasons or new complaints, these data fuel the discussion as to whether URVs can or should be prevented. TRIAL REGISTRATION For this cohort study, we used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This trial was pre-registered in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NTR6815 on the 7th of November 2017.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Readmissão do Paciente / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMC Geriatr Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda