Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Direct-to-participant investigational medicinal product supply in clinical trials in Europe: Exploring the experiences of sponsors, site staff and couriers.
de Jong, Amos J; Santa-Ana-Tellez, Yared; Zuidgeest, Mira G P; Grupstra, Renske J; Jami, Fatemeh; de Boer, Anthonius; Gardarsdottir, Helga.
Afiliação
  • de Jong AJ; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Santa-Ana-Tellez Y; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Zuidgeest MGP; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Grupstra RJ; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Jami F; Strategic Advice R&D Quality Assurance, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
  • de Boer A; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Gardarsdottir H; Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(12): 3512-3522, 2023 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438875
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Insights into the current practice of direct-to-participant (DtP) supply of investigational medicinal product (IMP) in the context of clinical trials conducted in Europe are needed, as regulations are unharmonized. This study is set out to explore how DtP IMP supply has been employed in Europe and what the advantages and disadvantages and barriers and facilitators of its implementation are.

METHODS:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with representatives from sponsor companies, courier services and site study staff involved in the IMP dispensing and delivery process in Europe. Interviews were conducted between May and November 2021, and data were analysed following thematic analysis.

RESULTS:

Sixteen respondents participated in one of the 12 interviews. Respondents had experience with different models of DtP IMP supply including shipment from the investigative site, a central pharmacy (a depot under the control of a pharmacist) and a local pharmacy-aiming to reduce trial participation burden. The respondents indicated that investigative site-to-participant shipment is not affected by regulatory barriers, but could burden site staff. Shipment from central locations was considered most efficient, but possible regulatory barriers related to maintaining participants' privacy and investigator oversight were identified. The respondents indicated that the involvement of local pharmacies to dispense IMP can be considered when the IMP is authorized.

CONCLUSIONS:

Several DtP IMP supply models are implemented in clinical trials conducted in Europe. In this study, three main DtP IMP models were identified, which can be referenced when describing these approaches for regulatory approval.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácias / Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Farmácias / Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda