Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extracellular volume fraction using contrast-enhanced CT is useful in differentiating intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma.
Honda, T; Onishi, H; Fukui, H; Yano, K; Kiso, K; Nakamoto, A; Tsuboyama, T; Ota, T; Tatsumi, M; Tahara, S; Kobayashi, S; Eguchi, H; Tomiyama, N.
Afiliação
  • Honda T; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Onishi H; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Fukui H; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Yano K; Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kiso K; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Nakamoto A; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tsuboyama T; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ota T; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tatsumi M; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tahara S; Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kobayashi S; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Eguchi H; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tomiyama N; Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1214977, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37483497
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate whether tumor extracellular volume fraction (fECV) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) aids in the differentiation between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods:

In this retrospective study, 113 patients with pathologically confirmed ICC (n = 39) or HCC (n = 74) who had undergone preoperative contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled. Enhancement values of the tumor (Etumor) and aorta (Eaorta) were obtained in the precontrast and equilibrium phase CT images. fECV was calculated using the following equation fECV [%] = Etumor/Eaorta × (100 - hematocrit [%]). fECV values were compared between the ICC and HCC groups using Welch's t-test. The diagnostic performance of fECV for differentiating ICC and HCC was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. fECV and the CT imaging features of tumors were evaluated by two radiologists. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting a diagnosis of ICC.

Results:

Mean fECV was significantly higher in ICCs (43.8% ± 13.2%) than that in HCCs (31.6% ± 9.0%, p < 0.001). The area under the curve for differentiating ICC from HCC was 0.763 when the cutoff value of fECV was 41.5%. The multivariate analysis identified fECV (unit OR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.21; p < 0.05), peripheral rim enhancement during the arterial phase (OR 17.0; 95% CI 1.29-225; p < 0.05), and absence of washout pattern (OR 235; 95% CI 14.03-3933; p < 0.001) as independent CT features for differentiating between the two tumor types.

Conclusions:

A high value of fECV, peripheral rim enhancement during the arterial phase, and absence of washout pattern were independent factors in the differentiation of ICC from HCC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão