Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of a Novel, Flavor-optimized, Polyethylene Glycol and Sulfate Bowel Preparation With Oral Sulfate Solution in Adults Undergoing Colonoscopy.
Bhandari, Raj; Goldstein, Michael; Mishkin, Daniel S; McGowan, John; Cleveland, Mark vB; Di Palma, Jack A.
Afiliação
  • Bhandari R; Delta Research Partners, Monroe, LA.
  • Goldstein M; Long Island GI Research Group, Great Neck, NY.
  • Mishkin DS; GI Reviewers, Brookline.
  • McGowan J; Braintree Laboratories, Inc, Braintree, MA.
  • Cleveland MV; Braintree Laboratories, Inc, Braintree, MA.
  • Di Palma JA; Braintree Laboratories, Inc, Braintree, MA.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 57(9): 920-927, 2023 10 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37490604
INTRODUCTION: A new bowel preparation for colonoscopy has been developed containing poorly absorbed sulfate salts and polyethylene glycol 3350, which retain water within the intestinal lumen resulting in copious diarrhea, thereby cleansing the bowel. The product was formulated to be safe and effective with a sports drink-like flavor. This study evaluated the new flavored polyethylene glycol and sulfate solution (FPSS) compared with a Food and Drug Administration-approved bowel preparation containing sulfate salts only [oral sulfate solution (OSS)]. METHODS: Five hundred adults were enrolled in this multicenter, noninferiority study. Subjects were assigned FPSS or OSS administered in split-dose regimens (PM/AM). FPSS subjects took 2 L of the flavored osmotic solution (1 L at night and 1 L in the morning). OSS was taken according to its approved labeling. Colonoscopies were graded globally and segmentally by blinded local investigators using a 4-point scale (excellent, good, fair, and poor), with "good" and "excellent" considered successful. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs) and laboratory testing. RESULTS: A high rate of cleansing success was seen with FPSS (94%), which was noninferior to OSS (94%). This conclusion was confirmed by blinded central readers. Segmental success rates were >90% for both preparations, including the right colon. Questionnaire ratings indicated the FPSS experience was preferred over OSS with 87% of FPSS subjects noting their preparation was "tolerable" to "very easy" to consume versus 74% for OSS. The majority of FPSS subjects agreed their preparation tasted like a sports drink. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common AEs. There was no difference between preparations for any AE and no clinically significant differences in laboratory parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The new sports drink-like flavored preparation achieved a high level of cleansing in the study, demonstrating noninferiority to OSS. FPSS was well-tolerated with low rates of expected gastrointestinal symptoms. The optimized flavor of FPSS resulted in significantly better acceptance ratings.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sulfatos / Catárticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sulfatos / Catárticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article