Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical leadership and coping strategies in times of COVID-19: observational study with health managers in Mendoza.
Gil-Hernández, Eva; Falaschi, Andrea; Carrillo, Irene; Rodríguez, Viviana; Peralta Roca, María Belén; García-Elorrio, Ezequiel; Mira, José Joaquín.
Afiliação
  • Gil-Hernández E; Atenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (Fisabio), Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
  • Falaschi A; Ministry of Health, Social Development and Sport, Government of Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina.
  • Carrillo I; Health Psychology Department, Miguel Hernández University, Avenida de la Universidad s/n, Elche, 03202, Spain. icarrillo@umh.es.
  • Rodríguez V; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Peralta Roca MB; Ministry of Health, Social Development and Sport, Government of Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina.
  • García-Elorrio E; Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Mira JJ; Atenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region (Fisabio), Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 869, 2023 Aug 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37587446
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic required an immediate response to the healthcare challenges it posed. This study was conducted to identify actions that helped healthcare professionals to overcome the initial impact in Mendoza (Argentina).

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was carried out in a non-random sample of managers and staff of the public health system of Mendoza (Argentina) (n = 134). An ad-hoc and voluntary survey was carried out with 5 multi-response questions that combined questions referring to the management of the pandemic at the organizational level with others referring to coping at the individual level. The survey questions were formulated based on the results of six focus groups that were conducted previously. Descriptive frequency analysis was performed.

RESULTS:

60 people agreed to participate and 45 answered the full questionnaire. At both the organizational and individual level, there was consensus with at least 50% of votes. The most outstanding at the organizational level was "Prioritize the need according to risk" and at the individual level it was "Support from family or friends", being also the most voted option in the whole questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS:

The responses that emerged for coping with COVID-19 must be seen as an opportunity to identify strategies that could be effective in addressing future crisis situations that jeopardize the system's response capacity. Moreover, it is essential to retain both changes at the organizational level (e.g., new protocols, multidisciplinary work, shift restructuring, etc.) and coping strategies at the individual level (e.g., social support, leisure activities, etc.) that have proven positive outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha