Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment for learning of paediatric cardiology trainees in 41 centres from 19 European countries.
McMahon, Colin J; Milanesi, Ornella; Pitkänen-Argillander, Olli; Albert-Brotons, Dimpna C; Michel-Behnke, Ina; Voges, Inga; Sendzikaite, Skaiste; Heying, Ruth.
Afiliação
  • McMahon CJ; Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Milanesi O; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
  • Pitkänen-Argillander O; School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Albert-Brotons DC; Paediatric Cardiac Unit, Department of Paediatrics, University of Padova, School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.
  • Michel-Behnke I; Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Voges I; Heart Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Sendzikaite S; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Paediatric Heart Centre, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Heying R; Department for Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Cardiol Young ; 34(3): 588-596, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641941
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Limited data exist on how trainees in paediatric cardiology are assessed among countries affiliated with the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology.

METHODS:

A structured and approved questionnaire was circulated to educationalists/trainers in 95 Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology training centres.

RESULTS:

Trainers from 46 centres responded with complete data in 41 centres. Instructional design included bedside teaching (41/41), didactic teaching (38/41), problem-based learning (28/41), cardiac catheterisation calculations (34/41), journal club (31/41), fellows presenting in the multidisciplinary meeting (41/41), fellows reporting on echocardiograms (34/41), clinical simulation (17/41), echocardiography simulation (10/41), and catheterisation simulation (3/41). Assessment included case-based discussion (n = 27), mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) (n = 12), directly observed procedures (n = 12), oral examination (n = 16), long cases (n = 11), written essay questions (n = 6), multiple choice questions (n = 5), and objective structured clinical examination (n = 2). Entrustable professional activities were utilised in 10 (24%) centres. Feedback was summative only in 17/41 (41%) centres, formative only in 12/41 (29%) centres and a combination of formative and summative feedback in 10/41 (24%) centres. Written feedback was provided in 10/41 (24%) centres. Verbal feedback was most common in 37/41 (90 %) centres.

CONCLUSION:

There is a marked variation in instructional design and assessment across European paediatric cardiac centres. A wide mix of assessment tools are used. Feedback is provided by the majority of centres, mostly verbal summative feedback. Adopting a programmatic assessment focusing on competency/capability using multiple assessment tools with regular formative multisource feedback may promote assessment for learning of paediatric cardiology trainees.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiologia / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol Young Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cardiologia / Aprendizagem Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cardiol Young Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / PEDIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irlanda