Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Uptake of robot-assisted colon cancer surgery in the Netherlands.
Sterk, Marlou F M; Crolla, Rogier M P H; Verseveld, Mareille; Dekker, Jan Willem T; van der Schelling, George P; Verhoef, Cornelis; Olthof, Pim B.
Afiliação
  • Sterk MFM; Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Crolla RMPH; Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Verseveld M; Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dekker JWT; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands.
  • van der Schelling GP; Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Verhoef C; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Olthof PB; Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. p.olthof@erasmusmc.nl.
Surg Endosc ; 37(11): 8196-8203, 2023 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37644155
BACKGROUND: The robot-assisted approach is now often used for rectal cancer surgery, but its use in colon cancer surgery is less well defined. This study aims to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted colon cancer surgery to conventional laparoscopy in the Netherlands. METHODS: Data on all patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer from 2018 to 2020 were collected from the Dutch Colorectal Audit. All complications, readmissions, and deaths within 90 days after surgery were recorded along with conversion rate, margin and harvested nodes. Groups were stratified according to the robot-assisted and laparoscopic approach. RESULTS: In total, 18,886 patients were included in the analyses. The operative approach was open in 15.2%, laparoscopic in 78.9% and robot-assisted in 5.9%. The proportion of robot-assisted surgery increased from 4.7% in 2018 to 6.9% in 2020. There were no notable differences in outcomes between the robot-assisted and laparoscopic approach for Elective cT1-3M0 right, left, and sigmoid colectomy. Only conversion rate was consistently lower in the robotic group. (4.6% versus 8.8%, 4.6% versus 11.6%, and 1.6 versus 5.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study on surgery for colon cancer shows there is a gradual but slow adoption of robotic surgery for colon cancer up to 6.9% in 2020. When comparing the outcomes of right, left, and sigmoid colectomy, clinical outcomes were similar between the robotic and laparoscopic approach. However, conversion rate is consistently lower in the robotic procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Laparoscopia / Neoplasias do Colo / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Robótica / Laparoscopia / Neoplasias do Colo / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda