Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deep learning model improves tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte evaluation and therapeutic response prediction in breast cancer.
Choi, Sangjoon; Cho, Soo Ick; Jung, Wonkyung; Lee, Taebum; Choi, Su Jin; Song, Sanghoon; Park, Gahee; Park, Seonwook; Ma, Minuk; Pereira, Sérgio; Yoo, Donggeun; Shin, Seunghwan; Ock, Chan-Young; Kim, Seokhwi.
Afiliação
  • Choi S; Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho SI; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung W; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee T; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Choi SJ; Department of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
  • Song S; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
  • Park G; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park S; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ma M; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Pereira S; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Yoo D; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin S; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Ock CY; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim S; Lunit Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
NPJ Breast Cancer ; 9(1): 71, 2023 Aug 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648694
ABSTRACT
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been recognized as key players in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer, but substantial interobserver variability among pathologists has impeded its utility as a biomarker. We developed a deep learning (DL)-based TIL analyzer to evaluate stromal TILs (sTILs) in breast cancer. Three pathologists evaluated 402 whole slide images of breast cancer and interpreted the sTIL scores. A standalone performance of the DL model was evaluated in the 210 cases (52.2%) exhibiting sTIL score differences of less than 10 percentage points, yielding a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.755 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.693-0.805) in comparison to the pathologists' scores. For the 226 slides (56.2%) showing a 10 percentage points or greater variance between pathologists and the DL model, revisions were made. The number of discordant cases was reduced to 116 (28.9%) with the DL assistance (p < 0.001). The DL assistance also increased the concordance correlation coefficient of the sTIL score among every two pathologists. In triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients who underwent the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the DL-assisted revision notably accentuated higher sTIL scores in responders (26.8 ± 19.6 vs. 19.0 ± 16.4, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the DL-assistant revision disclosed the correlation of sTIL-high tumors (sTIL ≥ 50) with the chemotherapeutic response (odd ratio 1.28 [95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.63], p = 0.039). Through enhancing inter-pathologist concordance in sTIL interpretation and predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, here we report the utility of the DL-based tool as a reference for sTIL scoring in breast cancer assessment.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Breast Cancer Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Breast Cancer Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article