Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-dose Effectiveness of Mpox Vaccine in Quebec, Canada: Test-negative Design With and Without Adjustment for Self-reported Exposure Risk.
Brousseau, Nicholas; Carazo, Sara; Febriani, Yossi; Padet, Lauriane; Hegg-Deloye, Sandrine; Cadieux, Geneviève; Bergeron, Geneviève; Fafard, Judith; Charest, Hugues; Lambert, Gilles; Talbot, Denis; Longtin, Jean; Dumont-Blais, Alexandre; Bastien, Steve; Dalpé, Virginie; Minot, Pierre-Henri; De Serres, Gaston; Skowronski, Danuta M.
Afiliação
  • Brousseau N; Biological Risks Department, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Carazo S; Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Febriani Y; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Padet L; Biological Risks Department, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Hegg-Deloye S; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Cadieux G; Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Bergeron G; Biological Risks Department, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Fafard J; Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Charest H; Direction régionale de santé publique de Montréal, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Lambert G; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.
  • Talbot D; Direction régionale de santé publique de Montréal, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Longtin J; Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Dumont-Blais A; Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada.
  • Bastien S; Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Dalpé V; Direction régionale de santé publique de Montréal, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Minot PH; Social and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • De Serres G; Axe Maladies infectieuses et immunitaires, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, QC, Canada.
  • Skowronski DM; Mpox Awareness Team, RÉZO Community Organization, Montreal, QC  Canada.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(2): 461-469, 2024 02 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37769158
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

During the 2022 mpox outbreak, the province of Quebec, Canada, prioritized first doses for pre-exposure vaccination of people at high mpox risk, delaying second doses due to limited supply. We estimated single-dose mpox vaccine effectiveness (VE) adjusting for virus exposure risk based only on surrogate indicators available within administrative databases (eg, clinical record of sexually transmitted infections) or supplemented by self-reported risk factor information (eg, sexual contacts).

METHODS:

We conducted a test-negative case-control study between 19 June and 24 September 2022. Information from administrative databases was supplemented by questionnaire collection of self-reported risk factors specific to the 3-week period before testing. Two study populations were assessed all within the administrative databases (All-Admin) and the subset completing the questionnaire (Sub-Quest). Logistic regression models adjusted for age, calendar-time and exposure-risk, the latter based on administrative indicators only (All-Admin and Sub-Quest) or with questionnaire supplementation (Sub-Quest).

RESULTS:

There were 532 All-Admin participants, of which 199 (37%) belonged to Sub-Quest. With exposure-risk adjustment based only on administrative indicators, single-dose VE estimates were similar among All-Admin and Sub-Quest populations at 35% (95% confidence interval [CI]-2 to 59) and 30% (95% CI-38 to 64), respectively. With adjustment supplemented by questionnaire information, the Sub-Quest VE estimate increased to 65% (95% CI1-87), with overlapping confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS:

Using only administrative data, we estimate one vaccine dose reduced the mpox risk by about one-third; whereas, additionally adjusting for self-reported risk factor information revealed greater vaccine benefit, with one dose instead estimated to reduce the mpox risk by about two-thirds. Inadequate exposure-risk adjustment may substantially under-estimate mpox VE.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacina Antivariólica / Mpox Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vacina Antivariólica / Mpox Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Infect Dis Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá