Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Specialty Impact on Patient Outcomes: Paving a Way for an Integrated Approach to Spinal Disorders.
Kuruba, Venkataramana; Cherukuri, Anjani Mahesh Kumar; Arul, Subiksha; Alzarooni, Abdulaziz; Biju, Sheryl; Hassan, Taimur; Gupta, Riya; Alasaadi, Saya; Sikto, Jarin Tasnim; Muppuri, Arnav C; Siddiqui, Humza F.
Afiliação
  • Kuruba V; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
  • Cherukuri AMK; Department of Medicine, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, IND.
  • Arul S; Department of Medicine, JONELTA Foundation School of Medicine, University of Perpetual Help System DALTA, Manila, PHL.
  • Alzarooni A; Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, IRL.
  • Biju S; Department of Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, IND.
  • Hassan T; Department of Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, College Station, USA.
  • Gupta R; Department of Medicine, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical College and Research Institute, Bangalore, IND.
  • Alasaadi S; Department of Medicine, University College of Dublin, Dublin, IRL.
  • Sikto JT; Department of Medicine, Jahurul Islam Medical College and Hospital, Bhagalpur, BGD.
  • Muppuri AC; Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
  • Siddiqui HF; Department of Internal Medicine, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus ; 15(9): e45962, 2023 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37900519
ABSTRACT
Spinal surgical procedures are steadily increasing globally due to broad indications of certain techniques encompassing a wide spectrum of conditions, including degenerative spine disorders, congenital anomalies, spinal metastases, and traumatic spinal fractures. The two specialties, neurosurgery (NS) and orthopedic surgery (OS), both possess the clinical adeptness to perform these procedures. With the advancing focus on comparative effectiveness research, it is vital to compare patient outcomes in spine surgeries performed by orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons, given their distinct approaches and training backgrounds to guide hospital programs and physicians to consider surgeon specialty when making informed decisions. Our review of the available literature revealed no significant difference in postoperative outcomes in terms of blood loss, neurological deficit, dural injury, intraoperative complications, and postoperative wound dehiscence in procedures performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. An increase in blood transfusion rates among patients operated by orthopedic surgeons and a longer operative time of procedures performed by neurosurgeons was a consistent finding among several studies. Other findings include a prolonged hospital stay, higher hospital readmission rates, and lower cost of procedures in patients operated on by orthopedic surgeons. A few studies revealed lower sepsis rates unplanned intubation rates and higher incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and pneumonia postoperatively among patient cohorts operated by neurosurgeons. Certain limitations were identified in the studies including the use of large databases with incomplete information related to patient and surgeon demographics. Hence, it is imperative to account for these confounding variables in future studies to alleviate any biases. Nevertheless, it is essential to embrace a multidisciplinary approach integrating the surgical expertise of the two specialties and develop standardized management guidelines and techniques for spinal disorders to mitigate complications and enhance patient outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article