Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does pre-stenting influence outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brain, Eleanor; Geraghty, Robert M; Tzelves, Lazaros; Mourmouris, Panagiotis; Chatzikrachtis, Nikolaos; Karavitakis, Markos; Skolarikos, Andreas; Somani, Bhaskar K.
Afiliação
  • Brain E; Newcastle Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Geraghty RM; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Tzelves L; Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Mourmouris P; Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Chatzikrachtis N; Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Karavitakis M; Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Skolarikos A; Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Somani BK; Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
BJU Int ; 2023 Nov 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37935590
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative use of JJ stents in patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) impacts on stone clearance and the rate of postoperative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We screened multiple databases from inception to January 2021, using the relevant search terms for SWL in patients with a preoperative stent. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials of ≥20 patients aged >18 years who had had SWL with a JJ stent. This review has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number CRD42023443195). Statistical analysis was performed using 'meta' in R. RESULTS: There were seven eligible studies (403 patients receiving JJ stents and 394 controls). There was no significant difference in the stone-free rate (SFR) following SWL with a JJ stent compared to SWL alone. When considering the complication rates, there was a significantly reduced risk of steinstrasse in patients with a JJ stent. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of other complications including pain, fever, and haematuria, and no significant difference in the likelihood of requiring auxiliary procedures or re-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reduced risk of steinstrasse in patients undergoing SWL with a JJ stent compared to SWL alone. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of other postoperative complications. Use of a JJ stent had no effect on the efficacy of SWL, with no significant difference in the SFR.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article