Anesthesia Choice and Its Potential Impact on Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Measurements in Esophageal Motility Disorders.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The widespread use of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has revolutionized the management of esophageal motility disorders (EMDs). The introduction of an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (EndoFLIP) can serve as a complimentary diagnostic tool to assess the mechanical properties (i.e., pressure, diameter, distensibility and topography) of the esophagus. During EndoFLIP measurements, different anesthesia techniques may induce variable degrees of neuromuscular blockade, potentially affecting esophageal motility and altering the results of EndoFLIP metrics. Our study aimed to compare the impact of using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) versus general anesthesia with inhalational anesthetics (GAIA) on diagnostic EndoFLIP measurements. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing EndoFlip during the POEM procedure at our institution between February 2017 and February 2022. We obtained the differences in pressure, diameter, and distensibility index using propofol-based TIVA vs sevoflurane-based GAIA with a 30ml and 60ml balloon. The differences were divided into terciles and compared between diagnoses using univariate comparisons and logistic regression models. RESULTS: 49 patients were included (39% Type 1 achalasia, 43% Type 2 or 3 achalasia, and 18% jackhammer esophagus (JE)). Compared to spastic disorders (Type 2, 3 and JE), Type 1 had lower values of pressure differences at 60 mL in univariate (3.75 vs 15.20 p=0.001) and multivariate (aOR 0.89 95%CI 0.82-0.978) analyses. Compared to Type 1, Type 2 and 3 had higher rates of pressure differences at 60 mL in univariate (9.85 vs 3.75 p=0.04); and nearly reached significance in multivariate analysis (1.09 95%CI 1-1.20). Compared to Type 1, JE demonstrated higher values in pressure differences at 60 mL (27.7 vs 3.75 p<0.001) CONCLUSION: Esophageal pressure, as measured by EndoFLIP, was significantly reduced when patients were sedated with sevoflurane-based GAIA. The use sevoflurane-based GAIA for diagnostic EndoFLIP may potentially lead to the misclassification of spastic disorders as Type I achalasia. Therefore, propofol-based TIVA should be considered over sevoflurane-based GAIA for sedation during the diagnostic test.