Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why to test for dementia: perspectives of patients, significant others and general practitioners.
Linden, Iris; Wolfs, Claire; Hevink, Maud; Dirksen, Carmen; Ponds, Rudolf; Perry, Marieke.
Afiliação
  • Linden I; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Wolfs C; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Hevink M; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Dirksen C; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Ponds R; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Perry M; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Age Ageing ; 53(1)2024 01 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251737
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to provide greater insight into the current decision-making process on diagnostic testing for dementia by exploring the expectations, needs and experiences of patients with memory complaints, significant others and general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS:

We performed semi-structured interviews with patients (>60 years) who consulted their GP on memory complaints, significant others and GPs. Participants were recruited until data saturation was reached in thematic analysis of interview transcripts.

RESULTS:

We performed 51 interviews (patients n = 20, significant others n = 15, GPs n = 16). Thematic analysis revealed four themes (i) 'drivers to (not) testing', i.e. need to act on symptoms, beliefs on the necessity and expected outcomes of diagnostic testing; (ii) 'patient preferences and context are critical in the actual decision', i.e. in the actual decision-making process interpretation of symptoms, GPs' desire to meet patient preferences, social context and healthcare system dynamics guided the decision; (iii) 'need for individualised communication in the decision-making process', i.e. for patients feeling heard was a prerequisite for decision-making and GPs tailored communication strategies to individual patients and (iv) 'GP practice and barriers to shared decision-making (SDM)', i.e. although GPs value SDM in the decision on diagnostic testing for dementia, patients express limited awareness of the decision and options at stake.

CONCLUSIONS:

Decision-making on diagnostic testing for dementia is a multifactorial and preference-guided process for all involved stakeholders, but decisions are often not explicitly jointly made. Development of patient decision aids could facilitate better involvement and more informed choices by patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Demência / Clínicos Gerais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Demência / Clínicos Gerais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda