Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the similarities and differences of burn registers globally: Results from a data dictionary comparison study.
Bebbington, Emily; Miles, Joanna; Young, Amber; van Baar, Margriet E; Bernal, Nicole; Brekke, Ragnvald Ljones; van Dammen, Lotte; Elmasry, Moustafa; Inoue, Yoshiaki; McMullen, Kara A; Paton, Lia; Thamm, Oliver C; Tracy, Lincoln M; Zia, Nukhba; Singer, Yvonne; Dunn, Ken.
Afiliação
  • Bebbington E; Centre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Wrexham Academic Unit, Technology Park, Wrexham LL13 7YP, UK. Electronic address: e.bebbington@bangor.ac.uk.
  • Miles J; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK.
  • Young A; Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Department of Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.
  • van Baar ME; Dutch Burn Repository R3, Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079 DZ Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bernal N; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43235, USA; Burn Care Quality Platform, American Burn Association, 311 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 950, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Brekke RL; Norwegian Burn Registry, Norwegian National Burn Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 22, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
  • van Dammen L; Burn Centres Outcomes Registry The Netherlands, Dutch Burns Foundation, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
  • Elmasry M; Burn Unit Database, Swedish Burn Register, Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic Surgery and Burns, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Inoue Y; Japanese Burn Register, Japanese Society for Burn Injuries, Shunkosha Inc. Lambdax Building, 2-4-12 Ohkubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-0072, Japan.
  • McMullen KA; Burn Model System, Burn Model System National Data and Statistical Center, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354237, Seattle, WA 98195-4237, USA.
  • Paton L; Care of Burns in Scotland, National Managed Clinical Network, NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, UK.
  • Thamm OC; German Burn Registry, German Society for Burn Treatment (DGV), Luisenstrasse 58-59, 10117 Berlin, Germany; University of Witten/Herdecke, Alfred-Herrenhausen-Strasse 50, 58455 Witten, Germany.
  • Tracy LM; School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
  • Zia N; South Asia Burn Registry, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Department of International Health, Health Systems Program, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
  • Singer Y; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Dunn K; Burn Care Informatics Group, NHS, UK.
Burns ; 50(4): 850-865, 2024 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267291
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Pooling and comparing data from the existing global network of burn registers represents a powerful, yet untapped, opportunity to improve burn prevention and care. There have been no studies investigating whether registers are sufficiently similar to allow data comparisons. It is also not known what differences exist that could bias analyses. Understanding this information is essential prior to any future data sharing. The aim of this project was to compare the variables collected in countrywide and intercountry burn registers to understand their similarities and differences.

METHODS:

Register custodians were invited to participate and share their data dictionaries. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were compared to understand each register population. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number of unique variables. Variables were classified into themes. Definition, method, timing of measurement, and response options were compared for a sample of register concepts.

RESULTS:

13 burn registries participated in the study. Inclusion criteria varied between registers. Median number of variables per register was 94 (range 28 - 890), of which 24% (range 4.8 - 100%) were required to be collected. Six themes (patient information, admission details, injury, inpatient, outpatient, other) and 41 subthemes were identified. Register concepts of age and timing of injury show similarities in data collection. Intent, mechanism, inhalational injury, infection, and patient death show greater variation in measurement.

CONCLUSIONS:

We found some commonalities between registers and some differences. Commonalities would assist in any future efforts to pool and compare data between registers. Differences between registers could introduce selection and measurement bias, which needs to be addressed in any strategy aiming to facilitate burn register data sharing. We recommend the development of common data elements used in an international minimum data set for burn injuries, including standard definitions and methods of measurement, as the next step in achieving burn register data sharing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Queimaduras / Sistema de Registros Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Burns Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Queimaduras / Sistema de Registros Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Burns Assunto da revista: TRAUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article