Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultra-low-dose photon-counting CT of paranasal sinus: an in vivo comparison of radiation dose and image quality to cone-beam CT.
Kaatsch, Hanns Leonhard; Fulisch, Florian; Dillinger, Daniel; Kubitscheck, Laura; Becker, Benjamin V; Piechotka, Joel; Brockmann, Marc A; Froelich, Matthias F; Schoenberg, Stefan O; Overhoff, Daniel; Waldeck, Stephan.
Afiliação
  • Kaatsch HL; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Fulisch F; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Dillinger D; Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Kubitscheck L; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Becker BV; Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to Ulm University, Munich 80937, Germany.
  • Piechotka J; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Brockmann MA; Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
  • Froelich MF; Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz 56072, Germany.
  • Schoenberg SO; Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany.
  • Overhoff D; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim 68167, Germany.
  • Waldeck S; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim 68167, Germany.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 53(2): 103-108, 2024 Feb 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330501
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study investigated the differences in subjective and objective image parameters as well as dose exposure of photon-counting CT (PCCT) compared to cone-beam CT (CBCT) in paranasal sinus imaging for the assessment of rhinosinusitis and sinonasal anatomy.

METHODS:

This single-centre retrospective study included 100 patients, who underwent either clinically indicated PCCT or CBCT of the paranasal sinus. Two blinded experienced ENT radiologists graded image quality and delineation of specific anatomical structures on a 5-point Likert scale. In addition, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and applied radiation doses were compared among both techniques.

RESULTS:

Image quality and delineation of bone structures in paranasal sinus PCCT was subjectively rated superior by both readers compared to CBCT (P < .001). CNR was significantly higher for photon-counting CT (P < .001). Mean effective dose for PCCT examinations was significantly lower than for CBCT (0.038 mSv ± 0.009 vs. 0.14 mSv ± 0.011; P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

In a performance comparison of PCCT and a modern CBCT scanner in paranasal sinus imaging, we demonstrated that first-use PCCT in clinical routine provides higher subjective image quality accompanied by higher CNR at close to a quarter of the dose exposure compared to CBCT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seios Paranasais / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha