Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PI-RADS Upgrading Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection and Biopsy Avoidance of MRI-Directed Diagnostic Pathways.
de Oliveira Correia, Eduardo T; Purysko, Andrei S; Paranhos, Bruno Merz; Shoag, Jonathan E; Padhani, Anwar R; Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
Afiliação
  • de Oliveira Correia ET; Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.
  • Purysko AS; Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Section, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Paranhos BM; Department of Radiology, Diagnosticos da America S.A, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Shoag JE; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Padhani AR; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • Bittencourt LK; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 222(5): e2330611, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353450
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND. PI-RADS incorporates rules by which ancillary sequence findings upgrade a dominant score to a higher final category. Evidence on the upgrading rules' impact on diagnostic pathways remains scarce. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the clinical net benefit of the PI-RADS upgrading rules in MRI-directed diagnostic pathways. METHODS. This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained clinical registry. The study included patients without known prostate cancer who underwent prostate MRI followed by prostate biopsy from January 2016 to May 2020. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 2 and higher. csPCa detection was compared between dominant (i.e., no upgrade rule applied) and upgraded lesions. Decision-curve analysis was used to compare the net benefit, considering the trade-off of csPCa detection and biopsy avoidance, of MRI-directed pathways in scenarios considering and disregarding PI-RADS upgrading rules. These included a biopsy-all pathway, MRI-focused pathway (no biopsy for PI-RADS ≤ 2), and risk-based pathway (use of PSA density ≥ 0.15 ng/mL2 to select patients with PI-RADS ≤ 3 for biopsy). RESULTS. The sample comprised 716 patients (mean age, 64.9 years; 93 with a PI-RADS ≤ 2 examination, 623 with total of 780 PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions). Frequencies of csPCa were not significantly different between dominant and upgraded PI-RADS 3 transition zone lesions (20% vs 19%, respectively), dominant and upgraded PI-RADS 4 transition zone lesions (33% vs 26%), and dominant and upgraded PI-RADS 4 peripheral zone lesions (58% vs 45%) (p > .05). In the biopsy-all, per-guideline MRI-focused, MRI-focused disregarding upgrading rules, per-guideline risk-based, and risk-based disregarding upgrading rules pathways, csPCa frequency was 53%, 52%, 51%, 52%, and 48% and biopsy avoidance was 0%, 13%, 16%, 19%, and 25%, respectively. Disregarding upgrading rules yielded 5.5 and 1.9 biopsies avoided per missed csPCa for MRI-focused and risk-based pathways, respectively. At probability thresholds for biopsy selection of 7.5-30.0%, net benefit was highest for the per-guideline risk-based pathway. CONCLUSION. Disregarding PI-RADS upgrading rules reduced net clinical bene fit of the risk-based MRI-directed diagnostic pathway when considering trade-offs between csPCa detection and biopsy avoidance. CLINICAL IMPACT. This study supports the application of PI-RADS upgrading rules to optimize biopsy selection, particularly in risk-based pathways.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article