Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Isolated Femoral Bifurcation Endarterectomy or Combined with Bypass Surgery for Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.
Ahmic, Edin; Hitzl, Wolfgang; Seitelberger, Rainald; Linni, Klaus.
Afiliação
  • Ahmic E; Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • Hitzl W; Research Office (Biostatistics), Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • Seitelberger R; Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • Linni K; Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(2)2024 Feb 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38399603
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and tissue loss treated with primary isolated femoral bifurcation endarterectomy (FBE) or with FBE combined with bypass surgery. Materials and

Methods:

This retrospective study was performed in a tertiary university-based care centre. Between January 2008 and December 2019, a prospectively collected database of patients suffering from CLTI and tissue loss and undergoing either primary FBE (group A) or FBE in combination with bypass surgery (group B) was analysed. Study endpoints were ulcer healing, primary and secondary patency rate, limb salvage, and survival.

Results:

In total, FBE was performed in 73 patients and FBE with bypass in 60 patients. Between both groups, there were no significant differences regarding demographic data or the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) grade III and IV of femoropopliteal lesions. After 3 years, ulcer healing could be achieved in 72% of FBE and in 75% of FBE with bypass patients. The primary patency rate was 95% and 91% for FBE and 83% and 80% for FBE with bypass after one and three years, respectively. The 3-year limb-salvage rate was 78% for FBE and 84% for FBE with bypass. The secondary patency rate after one and three years was 99% and 97% for FBE and 93% and 88% for FBE with bypass.

Conclusions:

FBE and FBE with bypass are equally effective for ulcer healing in cases of combined CFA and superficial femoral artery lesions. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding primary and secondary patency rates, limb salvage rates and ulcer healing. Isolated FBE could be an alternative strategy in patients with higher operative risk.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Enxerto Vascular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Enxerto Vascular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Áustria