Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical effects of cranial closing wedge osteotomy on joint stability in normal canine stifles: an ex vivo study.
Shimada, Masakazu; Huang, Chenxu; Yamakawa, Satoshi; Fujie, Hiromichi; Murakami, Sawako; Kanno, Nobuo; Hara, Yasushi.
Afiliação
  • Shimada M; Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan. masakazu42710@gmail.com.
  • Huang C; The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamakawa S; The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Fujie H; Department of Sports Medical Biomechanics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
  • Murakami S; The Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of System Design, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa, Hachioji- shi, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kanno N; Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.
  • Hara Y; Division of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo, 180-8602, Japan.
BMC Vet Res ; 20(1): 72, 2024 Feb 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402170
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cranial closing wedge osteotomy (CCWO) is a functional stabilisation technique for cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) ruptures. This biomechanical study aimed to evaluate the influence of CCWO on the stability of the stifle joint. Eighteen Beagle stifle joints were divided into two groups control and CCWO. The stifle joints were analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic joint biomechanical testing system. The joints were subjected to 30 N in the craniocaudal (CrCd) drawer and proximal compression tests and 1 Nm in the internal-external (IE) rotation test. Each test was performed with an extension position, 135°, and 120° of joint angle.

RESULTS:

The stifle joints were tested while the CrCLs were intact and then transected. In the drawer test, the CCWO procedure, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased CrCd displacement. The CCWO procedure and CrCL transection showed an interaction effect. In the compression test, the CCWO procedure decreased and CrCL transection and stifle joint flexion increased displacement. In the IE rotation test, CCWO, CrCL transection, and stifle joint flexion increased the range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS:

CCWO was expected to provide stability against compressive force but does not contribute to stability in the drawer or rotational tests. In the CCWO-treated stifle joint, instability during the drawer test worsened with CrCL transection. In other words, performing the CCWO procedure when the CrCL function is present is desirable for stabilizing the stifle joint.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Cão / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças do Cão / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: BMC Vet Res Assunto da revista: MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão