Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ankle strength assessed by one repetition maximum: A new approach to detect weaknesses in chronic ankle lateral instability.
Aguilaniu, Aude; Schwartz, Cédric; Abran, Guillaume; Baudoux, Laura; Croisier, Prof Jean-Louis.
Afiliação
  • Aguilaniu A; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: aude.aguilaniu@uliege.be.
  • Schwartz C; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium.
  • Abran G; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium.
  • Baudoux L; Central University Hospital of Liège, Belgium.
  • Croisier PJ; LAM - Motion Lab, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Physical Activity and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium; Central University Hospital of Liège, Belgium.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 30(4): 349-353, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429179
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ankle muscle strength should be assessed after a lateral ankle sprain (LAS) because a strength deficit can lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). No field method is available to obtain quantitative ankle dynamic strength values. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the one-repetition maximal (1-RM) method and to compare ankle muscle strength between healthy volunteers and those with CAI using 1-RM strength assessment approach.

METHODS:

We recruited 31 healthy volunteers and 32 with CAI. Dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor 1-RM were performed twice at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Strength values were compared between healthy volunteers and CAI.

RESULTS:

The 1-RM method is reliable for assessing ankle dorsiflexor, evertor, and invertor strength, with an ICC ranging from 0.76 to 0.88, and MDC ranging from 19 to 31%. Volunteers with CAI obtained evertor (3.0 vs. 3.5 N/kg), invertor (2.9 vs. 3.7 N/kg), and dorsiflexor (5.9 vs. 6.5 N/kg) strength values that were lower than healthy volunteers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The 1-RM test can be used in practice to assess evertor, invertor, and dorsiflexor strength during the rehabilitation of LAS. This field method could help practitioners to detect a strength deficit and individualize a strengthening programme if necessary.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos do Tornozelo / Força Muscular / Instabilidade Articular / Articulação do Tornozelo Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Traumatismos do Tornozelo / Força Muscular / Instabilidade Articular / Articulação do Tornozelo Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Foot Ankle Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article