Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chalk Talks for the Clinical Setting: Evaluation of a Medical Education Workshop for Fellows.
Soliman, Shady I; McGuire, William; Santos, Tricia; Goldberg, Charlie; Coffey, Charles; Wooten, Darcy.
Afiliação
  • Soliman SI; First-Year Resident, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine.
  • McGuire W; Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
  • Santos T; Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
  • Goldberg C; Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
  • Coffey C; Professor of Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
  • Wooten D; Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine.
MedEdPORTAL ; 20: 11385, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445069
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Chalk talks are effective teaching tools in the clinical setting. However, data on optimal strategies for teaching medical educators how to develop and deliver them are limited. We designed and implemented two 50-minute workshops to help subspecialty fellows across GME create and deliver a chalk talk.

Methods:

The first workshop comprised a demonstration of an effective chalk talk and a discussion of best practices for creating chalk talks; the second was a practice session where fellows presented their chalk talks and received feedback from faculty and peers. We evaluated pre- and postworkshop confidence in the ability to create and deliver a chalk talk and develop learning objectives. Secondary outcomes were faculty and peer evaluations of the chalk talks.

Results:

Eighteen of 33 participants (54% response rate) completed both pre- and postsession surveys. Fellows reported improved confidence in their ability to create a chalk talk (22% vs. 83%, p < .001), deliver a chalk talk (17% vs. 83%, p < .001), and develop well-written learning objectives (11% vs. 83%, p < .001). After the workshop, participants were more likely to correctly identify a chalk talk that made use of an advanced organizer (67% vs. 89%, p < .05). Thirty-eight faculty and peers completed feedback evaluations of participants' chalk talks; most rated fellows' chalk talks highly in domains of content, delivery, design, learning objectives, and engagement.

Discussion:

The incorporation of these workshop within a course on medical education can effectively develop clinical teaching skills among subspecialty fellows in GME.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica / Aprendizagem Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: MedEdPORTAL Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Educação Médica / Aprendizagem Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: MedEdPORTAL Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article