Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review of fair machine learning techniques when using real-world data.
Huang, Yu; Guo, Jingchuan; Chen, Wei-Han; Lin, Hsin-Yueh; Tang, Huilin; Wang, Fei; Xu, Hua; Bian, Jiang.
Afiliação
  • Huang Y; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Guo J; Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Chen WH; Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Lin HY; Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Tang H; Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Wang F; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Xu H; Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Bian J; Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: bianjiang@ufl.edu.
J Biomed Inform ; 151: 104622, 2024 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452862
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in health care to aid clinical decisions is widespread. However, as AI and ML take important roles in health care, there are concerns about AI and ML associated fairness and bias. That is, an AI tool may have a disparate impact, with its benefits and drawbacks unevenly distributed across societal strata and subpopulations, potentially exacerbating existing health inequities. Thus, the objectives of this scoping review were to summarize existing literature and identify gaps in the topic of tackling algorithmic bias and optimizing fairness in AI/ML models using real-world data (RWD) in health care domains.

METHODS:

We conducted a thorough review of techniques for assessing and optimizing AI/ML model fairness in health care when using RWD in health care domains. The focus lies on appraising different quantification metrics for accessing fairness, publicly accessible datasets for ML fairness research, and bias mitigation approaches.

RESULTS:

We identified 11 papers that are focused on optimizing model fairness in health care applications. The current research on mitigating bias issues in RWD is limited, both in terms of disease variety and health care applications, as well as the accessibility of public datasets for ML fairness research. Existing studies often indicate positive outcomes when using pre-processing techniques to address algorithmic bias. There remain unresolved questions within the field that require further research, which includes pinpointing the root causes of bias in ML models, broadening fairness research in AI/ML with the use of RWD and exploring its implications in healthcare settings, and evaluating and addressing bias in multi-modal data.

CONCLUSION:

This paper provides useful reference material and insights to researchers regarding AI/ML fairness in real-world health care data and reveals the gaps in the field. Fair AI/ML in health care is a burgeoning field that requires a heightened research focus to cover diverse applications and different types of RWD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Inform Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Aprendizado de Máquina Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Inform Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos