Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lightweight preprocessing and template matching facilitate streamlined ischemic myocardial scar classification.
Udin, Michael H; Armstrong, Sara; Kai, Alice; Doyle, Scott; Ionita, Ciprian N; Pokharel, Saraswati; Sharma, Umesh C.
Afiliação
  • Udin MH; University at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Armstrong S; Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Kai A; Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Doyle S; University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Ionita CN; University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Pokharel S; University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.
  • Sharma UC; University at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 11(2): 024503, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525295
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Ischemic myocardial scarring (IMS) is a common outcome of coronary artery disease that potentially leads to lethal arrythmias and heart failure. Late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging scans have served as the diagnostic bedrock for IMS, with recent advancements in machine learning enabling enhanced scar classification. However, the trade-off for these improvements is intensive computational and time demands. As a solution, we propose a combination of lightweight preprocessing (LWP) and template matching (TM) to streamline IMS classification.

Approach:

CMR images from 279 patients (151 IMS, 128 control) were classified for IMS presence using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and TM, both with and without LWP. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and processing time. External testing dataset analysis encompassed patient-level classifications (PLCs) and a CNN versus TM classification comparison (CVTCC).

Results:

LWP enhanced the speed of both CNNs (4.9x) and TM (21.9x). Furthermore, in the absence of LWP, TM outpaced CNNs by over 10x, while with LWP, TM was more than 100x faster. Additionally, TM performed similarly to the CNNs in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC, with PLCs demonstrating improvements across all five metrics. Moreover, the CVTCC revealed a substantial 90.9% agreement.

Conclusions:

Our results highlight the effectiveness of LWP and TM in streamlining IMS classification. Anticipated enhancements to LWP's region of interest (ROI) isolation and TM's ROI targeting are expected to boost accuracy, positioning them as a potential alternative to CNNs for IMS classification, supporting the need for further research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos