Using CHROMagar™ STEC medium exclusively does not recover all clinically relevant Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

ABSTRACT

Diagnostic laboratories in Aotearoa, New Zealand (NZ) refer cultures from faecal samples positive for Shiga toxin genes to the national Enteric Reference Laboratory for isolation of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) for epidemiological typing. As there was variation in the culture media being referred, a panel of 75 clinical isolates of STEC, representing 28 different serotypes, was used to assess six commercially available media and provide guidance to clinical laboratories. Recommendations were subsequently tested for a 3-month period, where STEC isolations and confirmations were assessed by whole genome sequencing analysis against the culture media referred. CHROMagar™ STEC (CH-STEC; CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) or CH-STEC plus cefixime-tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar was confirmed inferior to CH-STEC plus blood agar with vancomycin, cefsulodin, and cefixime (BVCC). The former resulted in fewer STEC types (n = 18) being confirmed compared to those from a combination of CH-STEC and BVCC (n = 42). A significant (P < .05) association with an STEC's ability to grow on CH-STEC and the presence of the ter gene cluster, and eae was observed. Culturing screen positive STEC samples onto both CH-STEC and BVCC ensures a consistently higher recovery of STEC from all clinical samples in NZ than CH-STEC alone.