Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT.
Lee, Jeong Sub; Kim, John; Bapuraj, Jayapalli R; Srinivasan, Ashok.
Afiliação
  • Lee JS; From the Department of Radiology (J.S.L.), Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju-si, Jeju-do, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Department of Radiology (J.K., J.R.B., A.S.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. johannk@med.umich.edu.
  • Bapuraj JR; Department of Radiology (J.K., J.R.B., A.S.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Srinivasan A; Department of Radiology (J.K., J.R.B., A.S.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 45(9): 1322-1326, 2024 Sep 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589057
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Currently, there is a lack of research directly comparing photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) in pediatric temporal bone CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of temporal bone CT scans in pediatric patients acquired with PCD-CT and EID-CT. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The retrospective study included a total of 110 pediatric temporal bone CT scans (PCD-CT, n = 52; EID-CT, n = 58). Two independent readers evaluated the spatial resolution of 4 anatomic structures (tympanic membrane, incudostapedial joint, stapedial crura, and cochlear modiolus) and overall image quality by using a 4-point scale. Interreader agreement was assessed. Dose-length product for each CT was compared, and subgroup analyses were performed based on age (younger than 3 years, 3-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12 years and above).

RESULTS:

PCD-CT demonstrated statistically significantly higher scores than EID-CT for all items (tympanic membrane, 2.9 versus 2.4; incudostapedial joint, 3.6 versus 2.6; stapedial crura, 3.2 versus 2.4; cochlear modiolus, 3.4 versus 2.8; overall image quality, 3.6 versus 2.8; P < .05). Interreader agreement ranged from good to excellent (interclass correlation coefficients, 0.6-0.81). PCD-CT exhibited a 43% dose reduction compared with EID-CT, with a particularly substantial reduction of over 70% in the subgroups of children younger than 6 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

PCD temporal bone CT achieves significantly superior imaging quality at a lower radiation dose compared with EID-CT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Osso Temporal / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Fótons Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: AJNR / AJNR Am J Neuroradiol / AJNR am. j. neuroradiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Osso Temporal / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Fótons Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: AJNR / AJNR Am J Neuroradiol / AJNR am. j. neuroradiology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article