Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of changing the reference countries on the list prices for patented medicines in Canada: A policy analysis.
Zhang, Wei; Guh, Daphne P; Grootendorst, Paul; Hollis, Aidan; Anis, Aslam H.
Afiliação
  • Zhang W; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall,Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, 570-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada. Electronic address: wei.zhang@ubc.ca.
  • Guh DP; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, 570-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
  • Grootendorst P; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3M2, Canada.
  • Hollis A; Department of Economics, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Anis AH; Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, Providence Research, 570-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Health Policy ; 144: 105064, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608459
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Canada's Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) uses external and internal reference pricing (IRP) to regulate patented drug list prices. PMPRB has changed external reference countries from 7 to 11 to include countries with prices closer to the OECD median. We examined the impact on the list prices for patented medicines had the amendment been implemented from 2013.

METHODS:

Using IQVIA MIDAS® quarterly sales data, we selected branded products that were launched in Canada in 2013-2018. The list price for each product in each country was calculated as its average annual price during the 3rd year post Canadian launch. The median international price (MIP) was the median of the list prices of PMPRB7 (MIP7) and PMPRB11 (MIP11). We assumed the same IRP would be (scenario 1) or would not be used (scenario 2).

RESULTS:

Among the selected 400 products, 80.3 % (321) had MIP7 and MIP11 (launched in at least one reference country); 18.3 % did not have MIP11. The total current expenditures were $7,134.4 M. In scenario 1, MIP11 would not be binding for most products and expenditures would decline only by 0.7 %. If IRP were abolished, expenditures might decline by 14.1 % if the launching sequence would not change.

CONCLUSIONS:

MIP11 might not be binding for most medicines. The impact depends on whether to retain the IRP and approaches taken for medicines without MIP11.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patentes como Assunto / Custos de Medicamentos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Policy / Health policy Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patentes como Assunto / Custos de Medicamentos Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Policy / Health policy Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article