Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) recommendations on intratumoral immunotherapy clinical trials (IICT): from premalignant to metastatic disease.
Luke, Jason J; Davar, Diwakar; Andtbacka, Robert H; Bhardwaj, Nina; Brody, Joshua D; Chesney, Jason; Coffin, Robert; de Baere, Thierry; de Gruijl, Tanja D; Fury, Matthew; Goldmacher, Gregory; Harrington, Kevin J; Kaufman, Howard; Kelly, Ciara M; Khilnani, Anuradha D; Liu, Ke; Loi, Sherene; Long, Georgina V; Melero, Ignacio; Middleton, Mark; Neyns, Bart; Pinato, David J; Sheth, Rahul A; Solomon, Stephen B; Szapary, Philippe; Marabelle, Aurelien.
Afiliação
  • Luke JJ; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA lukejj@upmc.edu.
  • Davar D; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Andtbacka RH; HiFiBiO Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Bhardwaj N; Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Brody JD; Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Chesney J; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
  • Coffin R; Replimune Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA.
  • de Baere T; Center for Biotherapies In Situ (BIOTHERIS), INSERM CIC1428, Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Medical Imaging, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.
  • de Gruijl TD; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Fury M; Cancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Goldmacher G; Cancer Immunology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Harrington KJ; Oncology Clinical Development, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
  • Kaufman H; Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
  • Kelly CM; The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Khilnani AD; Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Liu K; Ankyra Therapeutics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Loi S; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Long GV; Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
  • Melero I; Marengo Therapeutics, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Middleton M; Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Neyns B; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Pinato DJ; Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sheth RA; CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Solomon SB; Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Szapary P; Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium.
  • Marabelle A; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(4)2024 Apr 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641350
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intratumorally delivered immunotherapies have the potential to favorably alter the local tumor microenvironment and may stimulate systemic host immunity, offering an alternative or adjunct to other local and systemic treatments. Despite their potential, these therapies have had limited success in late-phase trials for advanced cancer resulting in few formal approvals. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to determine how to design clinical trials with the greatest chance of demonstrating the benefits of intratumoral immunotherapy for patients with cancers across all stages of pathogenesis.

METHODS:

An Intratumoral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials Expert Panel composed of international key stakeholders from academia and industry was assembled. A multiple choice/free response survey was distributed to the panel, and the results of this survey were discussed during a half-day consensus meeting. Key discussion points are summarized in the following manuscript.

RESULTS:

The panel determined unique clinical trial designs tailored to different stages of cancer development-from premalignant to unresectable/metastatic-that can maximize the chance of capturing the effect of intratumoral immunotherapies. Design elements discussed included study type, patient stratification and exclusion criteria, indications of randomization, study arm determination, endpoints, biological sample collection, and response assessment with biomarkers and imaging. Populations to prioritize for the study of intratumoral immunotherapy, including stage, type of cancer and line of treatment, were also discussed along with common barriers to the development of these local treatments.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SITC Intratumoral Immunotherapy Clinical Trials Expert Panel has identified key considerations for the design and implementation of studies that have the greatest potential to capture the effect of intratumorally delivered immunotherapies. With more effective and standardized trial designs, the potential of intratumoral immunotherapy can be realized and lead to regulatory approvals that will extend the benefit of these local treatments to the patients who need them the most.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segunda Neoplasia Primária / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segunda Neoplasia Primária / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos