Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Computational Evaluation of an Anatomic Patellar Component.
Kleeman-Forsthuber, Lindsay T; Owens, Jessell M; Johnson, Roseann M; Clary, Chadd W; Elkins, Jacob M; Dennis, Douglas A.
Afiliação
  • Kleeman-Forsthuber LT; Vermont Orthopaedic Clinic, Rutland, Vermont.
  • Owens JM; Swift Institute, Sparks, Nevada; Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado.
  • Johnson RM; Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado.
  • Clary CW; Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.
  • Elkins JM; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Dennis DA; Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado; Department of Bioengineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; Denver University, Denver, Colorado; Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(8S1): S70-S79, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735546
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anatomic patellar components for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have demonstrated favorable in vivo kinematics. A novel failure mechanism in TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component was observed prompting an investigation to identify patient- and implant-related factors associated with suboptimal performance.

METHODS:

A retrospective evaluation was performed comparing 100 TKA patients with an anatomic patellar component to 100 gender-, age-, and body mass index-matched patients with a medialized dome component. All surgeries were performed with the same posterior-stabilized TKA system with minimum of 1-year follow-up. Several radiographic parameters were assessed. A separate computational evaluation was performed using finite-element analysis, comparing bone strain energy density through the patella bone remnant.

RESULTS:

Patients with an anatomic patellar component had significantly higher rates of anterior knee pain (18 versus 2%, P < .001), chronic effusions (18 versus 2%, P < .001), and superior patellar pole fragmentation (36 versus 13%, P < .001) compared to those with a dome component. Radiographically, the anatomic group demonstrated more lateral patellar subluxation (2.3 versus 1.1 mm, P < .001) and lateral tilt (5.4 versus 4.0 mm, P = .013). Furthermore, there were more revisions in the anatomic group (7 versus 3, P = .331). On computational evaluation, all simulations demonstrated increased bone strain energy density at the superior patellar pole with the anatomic patella. Resection thickness <13 mm resulted in over 2-fold higher strain energy density, and negative resection angle of 7° resulted in 6-fold higher superior pole strain energy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with an anatomic patellar component showed higher rates of anterior knee pain, chronic effusion, and superior pole fragmentation compared to patients with a dome patella, with higher superior patellar pole strain energy confirmed on computational evaluation. Avoiding higher resection angles and excessive patellar resection may improve the performance and survivorship of the anatomic patella.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patela / Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patela / Artroplastia do Joelho / Prótese do Joelho Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article