Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Tobacco Product Prices at Fort Liberty Army Installation and Surrounding Community Areas, 2021.
Elliott, Alison M; Kong, Amanda Y; McGuirt, Jared; Prentice-Dunn, Hannah; Gougler-Reeves, Krysta M; Little, Melissa A; Ribisl, Kurt M.
Afiliação
  • Elliott AM; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Kong AY; Center for Cancer Prevention & Control Research, University of California Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles Young Drive South, CHS, A2-125, Los Angeles, CA 900095, USA.
  • McGuirt J; TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 655 Research Pkwy #400, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
  • Prentice-Dunn H; Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 Stanton L Young Blvd, Oklahoma City, OK 73117, USA.
  • Gougler-Reeves KM; Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 319 College Avenue, 318 Stone Building, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA.
  • Little MA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Ribisl KM; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 2024 May 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747193
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

High rates of tobacco use persist in the U.S. military, with 18.4% of service members smoking cigarettes in 2018. The Department of Defense's (DoD) 2017 policy required that tobacco retailers on military installations set tobacco product prices equal to the most common community price, including tax, but there is limited evidence confirming whether local retailers are adhering to this policy. We examined tobacco product pricing in tobacco retailers on- and off-post at the largest U.S. Army installation, Fort Liberty, and Cumberland County, North Carolina.

METHODS:

Between June-August 2021, we collected data on tobacco product availability, price, and promotions from retailers on Fort Liberty (n=14) and a random sample of off-post retailers within 10-miles of installation gates (n=52). We calculated the mode, mean, and median price of each product, plus the difference in these prices at on- and off-post retailers. We used Welch's t-test to test differences in mean prices between on- vs. off-post retailers.

RESULTS:

The mode, mean, and median prices of cigarette packs and cartons were lower on-post than off-post (e.g., $0.51-$0.55 cheaper for Marlboro cigarette packs on-post). However, the mode, mean, and median prices of smokeless tobacco products and little cigars were higher on-post than off-post (e.g., $0.82-$0.89 more costly for Swisher Sweets 2-packs on-post).

CONCLUSION:

Results highlight the need for continued enforcement to ensure compliance with the 2017 DoD policy. Comprehensive policy action to reduce tobacco price disparities on- and off-post is critical to reducing high rates of tobacco use among service members. IMPLICATIONS Despite the implementation of the 2017 DoD pricing policy, some tobacco products remain cheaper at tobacco retailers on-post compared to off-post retailers. Our results highlight the need for greater routine surveillance to increase implementation of the policy-particularly for cigarettes-to reduce high rates of tobacco use among service members.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine Tob Res Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos