Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychosocial impacts of Baby Friendly Spaces for Rohingya refugee mothers in Bangladesh: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Nguyen, Amanda J; Murray, Sarah M; Rahaman, Kh Shafiur; Lasater, Molly E; Barua, Suzit; Lee, Catherine; Schojan, Matthew; Tonon, Brigitte; Clouin, Laetitia; Le Roch, Karine.
Afiliação
  • Nguyen AJ; Department of Human Services, School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Murray SM; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Rahaman KS; Action Against Hunger, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
  • Lasater ME; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Barua S; Action Against Hunger, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
  • Lee C; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Schojan M; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Tonon B; Action contre La Faim, Paris, France.
  • Clouin L; Action contre La Faim, Paris, France.
  • Le Roch K; Action contre La Faim, Paris, France.
Glob Ment Health (Camb) ; 11: e64, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827334
ABSTRACT

Background:

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS), a psychosocial support program for Rohingya refugee mothers of malnourished young children in Bangladesh. Because BFS was already being implemented, we examined the benefit of enhancing implementation supports.

Methods:

In matched pairs, 10 sites were randomized to provide BFS treatment as usual (BFS-TAU) or to receive enhanced implementation support (BFS-IE). 600 mothers were enrolled and reported on maternal distress, functional impairment, subjective well-being and coping at baseline and 8-week follow-up. Data were analyzed using multilevel linear regression models to account for clustering; sensitivity analyses adjusted for the small number of clusters.

Results:

Significant within-group improvements in BFSIE were observed for distres (-.48, p = .014), functional impairment (-.30, p = .002) and subjective well-being (.92, p = .011); improvements in BFS-TAU were smaller and not statistically significant. Between-group comparisons favored BFS-IE for distress (ß = -.30, p = .058) and well-being (ß = .58, p = .038). Sensitivity adjustments produced p-values above .05 for all between-group comparisons.

Discussion:

Feasible adjustments to implementation can improve program delivery to increase impact on maternal distress and well-being. Although results should be interpreted with caution, study design limitations are common in pragmatic, field-based research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos