Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.
Marmé, F; Martin, M; Untch, M; Thode, C; Bonnefoi, H; Kim, S-B; Bear, H; Mc Carthy, N; Gelmon, K; García-Sáenz, J A; Kelly, C M; Reimer, T; Valota, O; Toi, M; Rugo, H S; Gnant, M; Makris, A; Bassy, M; Zhang, Z; Furlanetto, J; Nekljudova, V; Loibl, S.
Afiliação
  • Marmé F; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: talonso@salud.madrid.org.
  • Martin M; Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid; Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain.
  • Untch M; Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin.
  • Thode C; Amedes MVZ Wagnerstibbe für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Bonnefoi H; Institut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France.
  • Kim SB; Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Bear H; Division of Surgical Oncology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Health, Richmond, USA.
  • Mc Carthy N; Breast Cancer Trials Australia and New Zealand and University of Queensland, Icon Cancer Centre Wesley, Auchenflower, Australia.
  • Gelmon K; BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
  • García-Sáenz JA; Service de Oncología Médica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Kelly CM; Mater Private Hospital, Dublin and Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Reimer T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Valota O; Pfizer Srl, Milan, Italy.
  • Toi M; Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Rugo HS; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, USA.
  • Gnant M; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Makris A; Institute of Cancer Research, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
  • Bassy M; Amedes MVZ Wagnerstibbe für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Göttingen, Germany.
  • Zhang Z; Pfizer Inc, San Diego, USA.
  • Furlanetto J; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
  • Nekljudova V; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
  • Loibl S; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/GBG_Forschung.
ESMO Open ; 9(6): 103466, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38838498
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The PENELOPE-B study demonstrated that the addition of 1-year post-neoadjuvant palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo. Here, we report results for premenopausal women. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC at high risk of relapse [defined as no pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a clinical, pathological stage, estrogen receptor, grading (CPS-EG) score ≥3 or 2/ypN+] were randomized to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib or placebo + standard ET. Ovarian function (OF) was evaluated by centrally assessed estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Müllerian hormone serum levels.

RESULTS:

Overall, 616 of 1250 randomized patients were premenopausal; of these, 30.0% were <40 years of age, 47.4% had four or more metastatic lymph nodes, and 58.2% had a CPS-EG score ≥3. 66.1% of patients were treated with tamoxifen alone, and 32.9% received ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor (AI). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months (97.2% completeness) no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo was observed [hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.30, P = 0.737]. The estimated 3-year iDFS rate was marginally higher in the palbociclib arm (80.6% versus 78.3%). Three year iDFS was higher in patients receiving AI than tamoxifen plus OFS or tamoxifen alone (86.0% versus 78.6% versus 78.0%). Patients receiving tamoxifen plus OFS showed a favorable iDFS with palbociclib (83.0% versus 74.1%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-1.02, P = 0.057). Hematologic adverse events were more frequent with palbociclib (76.1% versus 1.9% grade 3-4, P < 0.001). Palbociclib seems not to negatively impact the OF throughout the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS:

In premenopausal women, who received tamoxifen plus OFS as ET, the addition of palbociclib to ET results in a favorable iDFS. The safety profile seems favorable and in contrast to chemotherapy palbociclib does not impact OF throughout the treatment period.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperazinas / Piridinas / Neoplasias da Mama / Pré-Menopausa / Receptor ErbB-2 / Terapia Neoadjuvante Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open / ESMO open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperazinas / Piridinas / Neoplasias da Mama / Pré-Menopausa / Receptor ErbB-2 / Terapia Neoadjuvante Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: ESMO Open / ESMO open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article