Head-to-head Comparison of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) Imaging With Luciferase-luciferin Imaging In Vivo Using Single-nanometer Laser-excitation Tuning and an Ultra-low-light-detection Camera and Optics Demonstrates the Superiority of GFP.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Genetic reporters encoding fluorescent proteins or luciferase have been used in vivo for the last three decades with claims about their superiority or inferiority over each other. In the present report, a head-to-head in vivo comparison of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence imaging and luciferase-luciferin imaging, using single-nanometer laser-excitation tuning of fluorescence excitation and an ultra-low-light-detection camera and optics was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mouse Lewis-lung carcinoma cells labeled with GFP (LLC-GFP) or luciferase (LL/2-Luc2) were injected subcutaneously into the flank of nude mice. One week after injection, GFP-fluorescence imaging and luciferase-luciferin imaging was performed using the UVP Biospectrum Advanced system with excitation at 487 nm and peak emission at 513 nm for GFP, and with emission at 560 nm for luciferase-luciferin. GFP fluorescence images were obtained at 0, 10, and 20 min. Luciferase-luciferin images were obtained 10 and 20 min after the injection of D-luciferin. RESULTS: The intensity of GFP images was 55,909 at 0 min, 56,186 at 10 min, and 57,085 at 20 min, and maintained after 20 min. The intensity of luciferase-luciferin images was 28,065 at 10 min after the injection of D-luciferin and 5,199 at 20 min after the injection. The intensity of luciferase-luciferin images decreased by approximately 80% at 20 min compared to 10 min. An exposure time of 30 s for luciferase-luciferin imaging was needed compared to 100 ms for GFP fluorescence imaging in order to detect signals. CONCLUSION: An imaging system with single-nanometer tuning fluorescence excitation and an ultra-low-light detection camera and optics was able to directly visualize both GFP and luciferase-luciferin images in vivo. The intensity and stability of the signals were both greater for GFP than for luciferase-luciferin, and the exposure time for GFP was 300 times faster, demonstrating the superiority of GFP.