Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched Investigation of the Occurrence, Management, and Prognosis of Anal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Patients.
Yao, Guorong; Zhou, Ziyang; Wang, Yiqi; Jiang, Yanting; Wang, Jili; Yan, Senxiang; Zhao, Feng.
Afiliação
  • Yao G; Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Zhou Z; Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wang Y; Graduate School, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Jiang Y; Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wang J; Graduate School, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Yan S; Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Zhao F; Graduate School, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Oncol Res Treat ; : 1-9, 2024 Jun 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934176
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Anal mucinous adenocarcinoma (AMAC) is an extremely rare form of anal cancer. Our objective was to examine the incidence, management, and prognostic factors of AMAC.

METHODS:

We analyzed age-adjusted incidence (AAI) rates over time and compared the prognosis of AMAC with anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and adenocarcinoma (AAC) using propensity score matching and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Patients were classified based on summary stage and treatments to determine cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS:

AAI of AMAC fluctuated within a narrow range (0.082-0.237 per million person-years) from 2000 to 2018. AMAC had a slight non-significant trend of worse prognosis than ASCC (p = 0.348) and a better prognosis than AAC (p < 0.01). Females made up a larger proportion of patients diagnosed with the distant disease (p < 0.05) and unmarried (p < 0.05) and somewhat less probably to need surgical removal (p < 0.01) and radiotherapy (p < 0.01). Elderly patients have lower rates of survival (p < 0.05). Localized stage was associated with better prognosis (p < 0.05). Surgery was associated with a tendency toward better survival (p = 0.095).

CONCLUSIONS:

AMAC exhibits a low incidence yet favorable prognosis compared to typical AAC and slightly worse compared to ASCC. Elderly age is associated with poorer prognosis, while localized stage indicates better prognosis. Surgery demonstrates a trend toward improved survival.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Oncol Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Oncol Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China