Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fibula Grafting for Oromandibular Reconstruction and its Effect on Patient Quality of Life - A Scoping Review.
Ebeling, Marcel; Hagmann, Alexander; Derka, Spyridoula; Schramm, Alexander; Wilde, Frank; Scheurer, Mario; Pietzka, Sebastian; Sakkas, Andreas.
Afiliação
  • Ebeling M; Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Mrclebeling@gmail.com.
  • Hagmann A; Medical School, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Derka S; Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Schramm A; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Attikon General University Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  • Wilde F; Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Scheurer M; Medical School, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Pietzka S; Department of Oral and Plastic Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Hospital Ulm, Academic Hospital of the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  • Sakkas A; Medical School, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
In Vivo ; 38(4): 1537-1545, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936931
ABSTRACT
Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap has been widely used for oncologic bony reconstruction of both the mandible and maxilla. Early and late morbidities of the donor side such as leg weakness, ankle instability, limited ankle mobility, tibial stress fractures or incision area pain are well documented; however, there is a lack of information about the effects of fibula grafting on patient quality of life. To address this issue, a scoping literature search in the PubMed electronic database was performed to identify all relevant studies and reviews in the period between 2010 and 2022. The potential discomforts after free fibula grafting and their impact on different domains of everyday living were identified and evaluated. The present literature review indicates that donor site morbidity can negatively impact patients' quality of life, albeit generally classified as minor. However, the functional and aesthetic benefits of oromandibular reconstruction clearly outweigh the associated sequelae. Nevertheless, the authors of this review highlight the importance of a comprehensive clinical evaluation of the donor site besides the recipient site during follow-up examinations. This would help to subjectively evaluate the functional and esthetical limitations of a patient's site and promptly detect morbidities that could lead to long-term complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Fíbula / Reconstrução Mandibular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: In Vivo Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Fíbula / Reconstrução Mandibular Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: In Vivo Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article