Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Disparities in the implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the United States.
Maraey, Ahmed; Yazdi, Vahid; Chaaban, Nourhan; Aglan, Amro; Elzanaty, Ahmed; Moustafa, Abdelmoniem; Karim, Saima; He, Beixin Julie.
Afiliação
  • Maraey A; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Yazdi V; University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Chaaban N; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Aglan A; Department of Internal Medicine Department, Lahey Clinic, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Elzanaty A; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Moustafa A; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  • Karim S; Heart and Vascular Institute, MetroHealth Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  • He BJ; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967399
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death is over 300,000 in the United States (US). Historically, inpatient implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been variable and subject to healthcare disparities.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate contemporary practice trends of inpatient secondary prevention ICD implants within the US on the basis of race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS:

The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 of adult discharges with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter, and fibrillation (VF). Adjusted ICD implantation rates based on race, sex, and SES and associated temporal trends were calculated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 193,600 primary VT/VF discharges in the NIS were included in the cohort, of which 57,895 (29.9%) had ICD placement. There was a significant racial and ethnic disparity in ICD placement for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients as compared to White patients; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 [p < .01], 0.90 [p  =  .03], 0.81[p < .01], 0.45 [p < .01], respectively. Female patients were also less likely to receive an ICD compared to male patients (aOR 0.75, p < .01). Disparities in ICD placement remained stable over the study period (ptrend ≥ .05 in all races, both sexes and income categories).

CONCLUSION:

Racial, sex, and SES disparities persisted for secondary prevention ICD implants in the US. An investigation into contributing factors and subsequent approaches are needed to address the modifiable causes of disparities in ICD implantation as these trends have not improved compared to historic data.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos