Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Costs: Does Extreme Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Confer a Cost Benefit When Compared with Mastectomy and Reconstruction?
Millen, Janelle-Cheri; Sibia, Udai; Jackson, Katherine; Stern, Stacey L; Orozco, Javier I J; Fancher, Crystal E; Grumley, Janie.
Afiliação
  • Millen JC; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA. janellecheri@gmail.com.
  • Sibia U; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Jackson K; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Stern SL; Department of Biostatistics, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Health System, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Orozco JIJ; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Fancher CE; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
  • Grumley J; Saint John's Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987370
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Extreme oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (eOBCS) describes the application of OBCS to patients who would otherwise need a mastectomy, and its safety has been previously described.

OBJECTIVE:

We aimed to compare the costs of eOBCS and mastectomy.

METHODS:

We reviewed our institutional database to identify breast cancer patients treated surgically from 2018 to 2023. We included patients with a large disease span (≥5 cm) and multifocal/multicentric disease. Patients were grouped by their surgical approach, i.e. eOBCS or mastectomy. The direct costs of care were determined and compared; however, indirect costs were not included.

RESULTS:

Eighty-six patients met the inclusion criteria, 10 (11.6%) of whom underwent mastectomy and 76 (88.4%) who underwent eOBCS. Six mastectomy patients (60%) had reconstruction and 6 (60%) underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Reconstructions were completed in a staged fashion, and the mean cost of the index operation (mastectomy and tissue expander) was $17,816. These patients had one to three subsequent surgeries to complete their reconstruction, at a mean cost of $45,904. The mean cost of EBRT was $5542. Thirty-four eOBCS patients (44.7%) underwent 44 margin re-excisions, including 6 (7.9%) who underwent mastectomy. Sixty (78.9%) of the eOBCS patients had EBRT. The mean cost of their index operation was $6345; the mean cost of a re-excision was $3615; the mean cost of their mastectomies with reconstruction was $49,400; and the mean cost of EBRT was $6807. The cost of care for eOBCS patients remained lower than that for mastectomy patients, i.e. $17,318 versus $57,416.

CONCLUSION:

eOBCS is associated with a lower cost than mastectomy and had a low conversion rate to mastectomy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos