Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of the RVA Breathes randomized controlled trial.
Everhart, Robin S; Lohr, Katherine D; Holder, Rachel L; Morton, Sarah C M; Miller, Ashley; Corona, Rosalie; Mazzeo, Suzanne E; Thacker Ii, Leroy R; Schechter, Michael S.
Afiliação
  • Everhart RS; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Lohr KD; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Holder RL; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Morton SCM; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Miller A; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Corona R; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Mazzeo SE; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Thacker Ii LR; Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
  • Schechter MS; Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States.
J Pediatr Psychol ; 2024 Jul 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994892
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study tested a randomized controlled trial of RVA Breathes, a community asthma program, in reducing asthma-related healthcare utilization among children living in an area with a high poverty rate.

METHODS:

Participants included 250 caregivers (78% African American/Black; 73.3% household income<$25,000/year) and their children with asthma (5-11 years). Inclusion criteria included an asthma-related emergency department (ED) visit, hospitalization, unscheduled doctor's visit, or systemic steroids in the past 2 years. Families were randomized to a full active intervention (asthma education with community health workers [CHWs], home remediation with home assessors, and a school nurse component; n = 118), partial active intervention (asthma education and home remediation; n = 69), or a control group (n = 63) for 9 months. Measures on healthcare utilization and asthma-related factors were collected. Follow-up assessments occurred across a 9-month period.

RESULTS:

Although we did not find any significant effects, there was a trend toward significance for a group by time effect with objective healthcare utilization as the outcome (F4,365 = 2.28, p = .061). The full intervention group experienced a significant decrease from baseline to 9-month follow-up compared with the other groups (p < .001). Only the full intervention group experienced a significant increase in reported asthma action plans across time (no significant group effect).

CONCLUSIONS:

In the context of the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, which led to a substantial global decrease in healthcare utilization, the study's main hypotheses were not supported. Nevertheless, findings support the benefit of community asthma programs that integrate care across multiple settings and connect families with CHWs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Psychol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Psychol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos