Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Practices and Considerations in Lung Biopsy for Suspected Granulomatous-Lymphocytic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Clinician Survey.
Bintalib, Heba M; Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild; Van de Ven, Annick A J M; Goddard, Sarah; Burns, Siobhan O; Warnatz, Klaus; Hurst, John R.
Afiliação
  • Bintalib HM; UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK.
  • Davidsen JR; Department of Respiratory Care, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Van de Ven AAJM; King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Goddard S; South Danish Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases (SCILS), Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Burns SO; Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Warnatz K; Departments of Internal Medicine & Allergology, Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Hurst JR; Department of Immunology, University Hospitals North Midlands, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Respiration ; : 1-9, 2024 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038442
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study explores clinicians' diagnostic practices and perceptions in the context of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD), a pulmonary manifestation of common variable immunodeficiency disorder. The aim was to gain valuable insights into key aspects, such as the utilization of radiological features for diagnostic purposes, indications for lung biopsy, preferred biopsy techniques, and the relative importance of different histopathological findings in confirming GLILD.

METHOD:

A survey targeting expert clinicians was conducted, focusing on their experiences, practices, and attitudes towards lung biopsy in suspected GLILD cases.

RESULTS:

The survey revealed that the majority of respondents accepted high-resolution computed tomography as a sufficient alternative to biopsy for making a probable GLILD diagnosis in most patients. There was a consensus among most respondents that the presence of extrapulmonary granulomatous disease is adequate for making a diagnosis of GLILD where the chest imaging and clinical picture are consistent. When a biopsy was recommended, there was notable variation in the preferred initial biopsy technique, with 35% favouring transbronchial biopsy.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings underscore the complexity of diagnosing GLILD, indicating varied clinician opinions on the necessity and efficacy of lung biopsies. They highlight the need for further research and the development of consistent diagnostic criteria and management protocols, ultimately aiming to enhance the accuracy and safety of GLILD diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Respiration Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Respiration Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido