Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The carbon footprint of the perioperative transurethral resection of bladder tumour pathway.
John, Joseph B; Collins, Michael; Eames, Sophie; O'Flynn, Kieran; Briggs, Tim W R; Gray, William K; McGrath, John S.
Afiliação
  • John JB; University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
  • Collins M; Department of Urology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
  • Eames S; Getting it Right First Time Programme, NHS England, London, UK.
  • O'Flynn K; Environmental Resources Management, London, UK.
  • Briggs TWR; Department of Urology, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
  • Gray WK; Getting it Right First Time Programme, NHS England, London, UK.
  • McGrath JS; Department of Urology, Salford Royal, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
BJU Int ; 2024 Jul 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051536
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the carbon footprint of the perioperative transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) pathway from decision to treat to postoperative discharge, and model potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This process-based attributional cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment (LCA) of GHG emissions modelled the perioperative TURBT pathway at a hospital in Southwest England. We included travel, energy and water use, all reusable and consumable items, and laundry and equipment sterilisation. Resource use for 30 patients undergoing surgery was recorded to understand average GHG emissions and the inter-case variability. Sensitivity analysis was performed for manufacturing location, pharmaceutical manufacturing carbon-intensity, and theatre list utilisation.

RESULTS:

The median (interquartile range) perioperative TURBT carbon footprint was 131.8 (119.8-153.6) kg of carbon dioxide equivalent. Major pathway categories contributing to GHG emissions were surgical equipment (22.2%), travel (18.6%), gas and electricity (13.3%), and anaesthesia/drugs and associated adjuncts (27.0%), primarily due to consumable items and processes. Readily modifiable GHG emissions hotspots included patient travel for preoperative assessment, glove use, catheter use, irrigation delivery and extraction, and mitomycin C disposal. GHG emissions were higher for those admitted as inpatients after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS:

This cradle-to-grave LCA found multiple modifiable GHG emissions hotspots. Key mitigation themes include minimising avoidable patient travel, rationalising equipment use, optimally filling operating theatre lists, and safely avoiding postoperative catheterisation and hospital admission where possible. A crucial next step is to design and deliver an implementation strategy for the environmentally sustainable changes demonstrated herein.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BJU Int Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article