Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blood Pressure Control in Pregnant Patients with Chronic Hypertension and Diabetes: Should <130/80 be the Target?
Harper, Lorie M; Kuo, Hui-Chien; Boggess, Kim; Dugoff, Lorraine; Sibai, Baha; Lawrence, Kirsten; Hughes, Brenna L; Bell, Joseph; Aagaard, Kjersti; Edwards, Rodney K; Gibson, Kelly S; Haas, David M; Plante, Lauren; Metz, Torri D; Casey, Brian M; Esplin, Sean; Longo, Sherri; Hoffman, Matthew; Saade, George R; Hoppe, Kara; Foroutan, Janelle; Tuuli, Methodius G; Owens, Michelle Y; Simhan, Hyagriv N; Frey, Heather A; Rosen, Todd; Palatnik, Anna; August, Phyllis; Reddy, Uma M; Kinzler, Wendy; Su, Emily J; Krishna, Iris; Nguyen, Nguyet A; Norton, Mary E; Skupski, Daniel; El-Sayed, Yasser Y; Galis, Zorina S; Ambalavanan, Namasivayam; Oparil, Suzanne; Szychowski, Jeff M; Tita, Alan T N.
Afiliação
  • Harper LM; Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin. Electronic address: lorie.harper@austin.utexas.edu.
  • Kuo HC; Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Boggess K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
  • Dugoff L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Sibai B; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas at Houston.
  • Lawrence K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University.
  • Hughes BL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University.
  • Bell J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's University Health Network.
  • Aagaard K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital and HCA Healthcare and HCA Healthcare Research Institute, Nashville, TN and HCA Texas Maternal Fetal Medicine, Houston, TX.
  • Edwards RK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences.
  • Gibson KS; MetroHealth System.
  • Haas DM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University.
  • Plante L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine.
  • Metz TD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health.
  • Casey BM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern.
  • Esplin S; Intermountain Healthcare, Utah.
  • Longo S; Ochsner Baptist Medical Center.
  • Hoffman M; Christiana Care Health Services.
  • Saade GR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical Center.
  • Hoppe K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • Foroutan J; St. Peters University Hospital.
  • Tuuli MG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University.
  • Owens MY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center.
  • Simhan HN; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee Women's Hospital and University of Pittsburgh.
  • Frey HA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University.
  • Rosen T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rutgers University-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
  • Palatnik A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin.
  • August P; Weill Cornell University.
  • Reddy UM; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University.
  • Kinzler W; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital.
  • Su EJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado.
  • Krishna I; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University.
  • Nguyen NA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health.
  • Norton ME; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
  • Skupski D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Presbyterian Queens Hospital.
  • El-Sayed YY; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University.
  • Galis ZS; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, NHLBI, Bethesda, MD.
  • Ambalavanan N; University of Alabama at Birmingham Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics43 and Center for Women's Reproductive Health.
  • Oparil S; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine and Center for Women's Reproductive Health.
  • Szychowski JM; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Biostatistics and Center for Women's Reproductive Health.
  • Tita ATN; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Center for Women's Reproductive Health.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 2024 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39288828
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Study (CHAP) demonstrated that a target blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg during pregnancy is associated with improved perinatal outcomes. Outside of pregnancy, pharmacologic therapy for patients with diabetes and hypertension is adjusted to a target blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg. During pregnancy, patients with both diabetes and chronic hypertension may also benefit from tighter control with a target blood pressure (BP) <130/80 mm Hg.

OBJECTIVE:

We compared perinatal outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes who achieved BP <130/80 versus 130-139/80-89 mm Hg. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Participants were included in this secondary analysis if they had diabetes diagnosed prior to pregnancy or at <20 weeks' gestation and at least two recorded BP measurements prior to delivery. Average systolic and diastolic BP were calculated using ambulatory antenatal BPs. The primary composite outcome was preeclampsia with severe features, indicated preterm birth <35 weeks, or placental abruption. Secondary outcomes were components of the primary outcome, cesarean delivery, fetal or neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and small for gestational age (SGA). Comparisons were made between those with an average systolic BP <130 mm Hg and average diastolic BP <80 mm Hg and those with an average systolic blood pressure 130-139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure 80-89 mm Hg using Student's t-test and chi-squared tests. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate risk ratios between blood pressure groups for dichotomous outcomes while accounting for baseline covariates.

RESULTS:

Of 434 participants included, 150 (34.6%) had an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 were more likely to be on antihypertensive medications at the start of pregnancy and more likely to have newly diagnosed DM prior to 20 weeks. Participants with an average blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg were less likely to have the primary adverse perinatal outcome (19.3% vs 46.5%, adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.61, p<0.01), with decreased risks specifically of preeclampsia with severe features (aRR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23-0.54) and indicated preterm birth prior to 35 weeks (aRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.79). The risk of NICU admission was lower in the lower blood pressure group (aRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94). No differences were noted in cesarean delivery (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.20), fetal or neonatal death (aRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.12-2.92). SGA less than the 10th percentile was lower in the lower blood pressure group (aRR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.96).

CONCLUSION:

In those with chronic hypertension and diabetes prior to 20 weeks, achieving an average goal blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg may be associated with improved perinatal outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article