Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized comparison of fluconazole with amphotericin B as empiric anti-fungal agents in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia.
Malik, I A; Moid, I; Aziz, Z; Khan, S; Suleman, M.
Afiliação
  • Malik IA; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.
Am J Med ; 105(6): 478-83, 1998 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9870832
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Several studies have documented the efficacy of amphotericin B as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia. Amphotericin, however, is a toxic drug. Fluconazole has broad-spectrum antifungal activity with an excellent safety profile. Although prophylactic use of fluconazole is widespread, its efficacy as an empiric antifungal agent has not been extensively investigated. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

We randomly assigned 106 patients with absolute neutropenia (< or = 500 cells microL) and persistent fever of undetermined origin (> 38 degrees C) despite 1 week of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy to receive either fluconazole 400 mg orally daily or amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day. Patients with obvious invasive fungal infections were excluded, as were those with abnormal renal or hepatic function. Success was defined as defervescence with the initially assigned antifungal regimen without development of clinically evident invasive fungal infection.

RESULTS:

Six patients were excluded from the analysis, mostly because they did not have severe neutropenia. Forty-eight patients received amphotericin B, and 52 received fluconazole. Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters as well as duration of neutropenia (7.7 versus 6.9 days), duration of fever (7.8 versus 8.1 days), and duration of hospitalization (10.4 versus 8.3 days) were similar between those receiving amphotericin and fluconazole. Treatment success rates and mortality rates were similar in the two groups 22 (46%) patients in the amphotericin group and 29 (56%) patients in the fluconazole group responded successfully to therapy (P = 0.3), whereas 16 (33%) patients in the amphotericin group and 14 (27%) patients in the fluconazole group died during hospitalization (P = 0.5). Adverse events such as chills and fever (4 versus 1), bronchospasm (2 versus none), severe hypokalemia (25 versus 12) and nephrotoxicity (9 versus 3) were more frequently observed in patients receiving amphotericin. Adverse prognostic factors included prolonged duration of neutropenia and pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results suggest that fluconazole is an equally effective but less toxic alternative to amphotericin B as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with prolonged fever and neutropenia.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluconazol / Anfotericina B / Febre / Micoses / Antifúngicos / Neoplasias / Neutropenia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluconazol / Anfotericina B / Febre / Micoses / Antifúngicos / Neoplasias / Neutropenia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Am J Med Ano de publicação: 1998 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão