Evaluation of the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders on anti-VEGF treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema in real life: MARMASIA study group report No. 10.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of vitreomacular interface disorders (VMID) on treatment response in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) due to diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: Three hundred seventy-seven eyes of 239 patients in the MARMASIA Study Group who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment (IVT) due to DME were included in the study. The group 1 consisted of 44 eyes of the patients who had not received any treatment before, were followed up regularly for 24 months after at least a 3-month loading dose, and suffered from VMID such as epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular adhesion or traction, and lamellar hole. The group 2 consisted of 333 eyes of the patients without VMID. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) of the patients at baseline, 3rd month, 6th month, 1st year and 2nd year follow-ups were measured. RESULTS: The mean age of the Groups 1 and 2 was 67.1 ± 11.3 and 61.9 ± 10.2 years, respectively. 61.3% of the group 1 and 58.8% of the group 2 were female (p > 0.05). The duration of diabetes was 19.2 ± 3.7 and 15.8 ± 3.2 years, respectively, and the number of follow-ups was 16.09 ± 4.68 and 12.06 ± 4.58, respectively in the groups (p < 0.001, 0.001, respectively). The number of IVT was 7.13 ± 2.71 and 7.20 ± 2.22, respectively in the groups 1 and 2 and no statistically significant difference was observed between them (p = 0.860). According to logMAR, BCVA values at baseline were 0.63 ± 0.24 and 0.59 ± 0.26 (p = 0.29), respectively, in the groups and the amount of change in BCVA at the end of the 2nd year was - 0.02 ± 0.48 in the group 1 and - 0.12 ± 0.48 in the group 2. It was observed as 0.48 (p = 0.13). Although the increase in BCVA was greater at all follow-ups in the group 2 compared to their initial examination, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of BCVA change. The CMT values of the groups at baseline were 442.5 ± 131.3 µm and 590.9 ± 170.6 µm, respectively (p = 0.03) The decrease in CMT after IVT was significantly greater in the group 2 at all follow-ups when compared to the first group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While the presence of VMID in DME patients receiving IVT did not affect visual results, it negatively affected the anatomical response and macular edema morphology. The presence of VMID at baseline affected the success of IVT. It should be taken into consideration that VMID may resolve spontaneously or with IVT, and new cases of VMID may occur in patients during the treatment process.

Effects of fluorescein on corneal endothelial morphology after fundus fluorescein angiography in patients with diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of fluorescein dye on corneal endothelial morphology (CEM) after fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients were divided into two groups, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (Group-1, NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (Group-2, PDR). CEM properties including endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation of cell area (CV), average cell area (AVG), percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured before FFA and at week 1 and month 1 after FFA were collected from patients' charts. RESULTS: The study consisted of 48 patient's 48 eyes in Group-1 and 50 patient's 50 eyes in Group-2. In both groups, the mean ECD, CV, AVG, HEX, and CCT measurements at week 1 and month 1 after FFA did not differ statistically from the mean measurements before FFA (p > 0.05). The mean ECD measurements in Group-1 were higher than that in Group-2 and showed statistically significant differences among the groups (p < 0.01 for all). In the Pearson correlation analysis in Group-1, there was no statistically significant relationship between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and (intraocular pressure) IOP values and ECD, AVG, CV, HEX, and CCT measurements (except central macular thickness [CMT] and HEX) before FFA, at week 1 and month 1 after FFA (p > 0.05). In Group-2 there was no statistically significant relationship between BCVA, IOP, and CMT measurements and ECD, AVG, CV, HEX, and CCT measurements before FFA, at week 1 and month 1 after FFA (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant change in CEM after FFA in patients with NPDR and PDR with DME.

Efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept on reducing maximum diameter of largest cyst in diabetic cystoid macular edema: MARMASIA study group.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and ranibizumab (IVR) on the maximal diameter of the largest intraretinal cyst (mdIRC), indicating chronicity in patients with diabetic cystoid macular edema (CME). METHODS: This retrospective, comparative study included a subgroup of patients from the MARMASIA Study with treatment-naïve diabetic CME who had IVA (IVA group) or IVR (IVR group) on a pro re nata regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and followed-up for 24 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and mdIRC (µm) and their changes during the study period in the IVA and IVR groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 175 eyes (65 [37.1%] in IVA and 110 [62.9%] in IVR group) of 113 patients were included in the study analysis. Both groups had statistically significant improvements in BCVA and CMT during the follow-up (p < 0.05 for all), which were comparable between the groups at each time point. However, the mean reduction in mdIRCs was consistently and significantly higher in the IVA group compared to the IVR group at each follow-up examination (F[1, 3.52] = 6.93, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: IVA seems to have a greater impact in reducing cyst sizes than IVR in diabetic CME.

Real-World Outcomes of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema in Türkiye: MARMASIA Study Group Report No. 1.

Objectives: This study aimed to report the demographic and clinical characteristics of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF) and provide an overview of outcomes during routine clinical practice in Türkiye. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, real-world study included 1,372 eyes (854 patients) treated with a pro re nata protocol by 21 ophthalmologists from 8 tertiary clinics on the Asian side of the Marmara region of Türkiye (MARMASIA Study Group). Five cohort groups were established by collecting the patients' baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36-month follow-up data, where each subsequent cohort may include the previous. Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, approximate ETDRS letters) and central macular thickness (CMT, µm), number of visits and IVI, and rates of anti-VEGF switch and intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) combination were evaluated. Results: The 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36-month cohorts included 1372 (854), 1352 (838), 1185 (722), 972 (581), and 623 (361) eyes (patients), respectively. The mean baseline BCVA and CMT were 51.4±21.4 letters and 482.6±180.3 µm. The mean changes from baseline in BCVA were +7.6, +9.1, +8.0, +8.6, and +8.4 letters, and in CMT were -115.4, -140.0, -147.9, -167.3, and -215.4 µm at the 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36-month visits (p<0.001 for all). The median cumulative number of anti-VEGF IVI was 3.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.0, and 9.0, respectively. The overall anti-VEGF switch and IDI combination rates were 18.5% (253/1372 eyes) and 35.0% (480/1372 eyes), respectively. Conclusion: This largest real-life study of DME from Türkiye demonstrated BCVA gains inferior to randomized controlled trials, mainly due to the lower number of IVI. However, with the lower baseline BCVA and higher IDI combination rates in our cohorts, these gains were relatively superior to other real-life study counterparts.

Glutathione S-transferase expression in benign and malignant eyelid tumors.

Eyelid tumors commonly originate from the skin and its appendages. Environmental toxins and oxidants affect eyelid carcinogenesis. Glutathione S-transferases (GST) are antioxidants that participate in pathogenesis. We investigated GST levels in malignant and benign eyelid tumors in otherwise healthy individuals. We used 57 malignant eyelid biopsies, benign eyelid biopsies, and tissue removed during blepharoplasty and entropion operations culled from pathology archives. Specimens were divided into three groups: malignant lesions, benign lesions and controls consisting of eyelid tissue removed during routine blepharoplasty and entropion surgery. Specimens were immunostained for seven GST (GST-A, GST-P, GST-Z, GST-S, GST-K, GST-O, GST-T) and the intensity of staining was quantified. In the malignant group, GST-O and GST-P staining was less intense than for the control group. In the benign group, the GST-P level was less than for the control group. We found no significant difference between the intensity of staining in malignant and benign groups. Our findings suggest that GST-O and GST-P enzymes may play significant roles in eyelid carcinogenesis.