Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3645-3652, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35061081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although there is extensive literature on robotic total intracorporeal anastomosis (TICA) for right colon resection, left total ICA using the da Vinci Xi robotic platform has only been described in short case series previously. In this study, we report on the largest cohort of robotic left total ICA, provide a description of our institution's techniques, and compare outcomes to robotic left partial extracorporeal anastomosis (PECA). METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic left colectomy for any underlying pathology from July 1, 2016 through April 30, 2020 were identified by procedure code. A technical description is provided for two unique techniques performed at our institution. Outcomes included operative time, length of stay, supply cost, post-operative ileus, post-operative morbidity and mortality and need for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure. RESULTS: From a review of our institution's data, 83 robotic TICA cases were identified and 76 robotic PECA cases were identified. Common procedures included low anterior resection, sigmoidectomy, left hemicolectomy, and rectopexy with resection. TICA was associated with significantly shorter intraoperative time compared to PECA. CONCLUSIONS: Our series shows that TICA is a safe and feasible technique that does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes. Using either the anvil-forward or anvil-backward technique, we were able to reliably reproduce this method in a total of 83 patients undergoing left colon resection for either benign or malignant diseases.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(10): 1312-1320, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022639

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening describe various colorectal screening modalities as well as recommended screening schedules for patients at average or increased risk of developing sporadic CRC. They are intended to aid physicians with clinical decision-making regarding CRC screening for patients without defined genetic syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on select recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, including a section on primary and secondary CRC prevention, and provide context for the panel's recommendations regarding the age to initiate screening in average risk individuals and follow-up for low-risk adenomas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo
3.
Surg Endosc ; 34(11): 5153-5159, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32909211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common colorectal procedures that require access to all quadrants of the abdomen are subtotal colectomy (STC) and total proctocolectomy (TPC). These are frequently performed with a surgical robot, but multiquadrant operations have unique challenges during robot-assisted surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic STC or TPC with the da Vinci Xi surgical robot at our institution from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019 were identified by diagnosis and procedure codes. A technical description is provided for the techniques utilized at our institution. Outcomes included operative times (OT), supply cost and length of stay. Associated morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. RESULTS: From a review of our institution's robotic surgery data, 37 cases were identified that utilized the described technique. Of these cases, 21 were robotic STC and 16 were TPC. Total mean OT was 276.86 min (SD ± 119.49). Mean OT was further analyzed by year, which demonstrated an overall decrease in OT from 350.91 min (SD ± 46.38) in 2016 to 221.43 min (SD ± 16.46) in 2018 (p = 0.008). A total of 21 cases were performed prior to 2018. Overall OT for STC was 222.81 min (SD ± 14.54) compared to overall TPC OT 347.81 min (SD ± 34.35). Median length of stay was 5 days [25th and 75th percentiles 4, 6, respectively]. There was no 30-day mortality and only one return to operating room for mesenteric bleeding. There was a low risk of mortality associated with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides the largest cohort of patients assessed who have undergone multiquadrant robotic STC or TPC. The study provides a detailed description of the technique utilized at our institution. There was no associated 30-day mortality and a low risk of morbidity. The data suggest that the learning curve for improved operative time is between 15 and 20 cases.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/instrumentación , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Robótica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Surg Endosc ; 34(4): 1712-1721, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of the surgical robot has increased annually since its introduction, especially in general surgery. Despite the tremendous increase in utilization, there are currently no validated curricula to train residents in robotic surgery, and the effects of robotic surgery on general surgery residency training are not well defined. In this study, we aim to explore the perceptions of resident and attending surgeons toward robotic surgery education in general surgery residency training. METHODS: We performed a qualitative thematic analysis of in-person, one-on-one, semi-structured interviews with general surgery residents and attending surgeons at a large academic health system. Convenient and purposeful sampling was performed in order to ensure diverse demographics, experiences, and opinions were represented. Data were analyzed continuously, and interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached, which occurred after 20 residents and seven attendings. RESULTS: All interviewees agreed that dual consoles are necessary to maximize the teaching potential of the robotic platform, and the importance of simulation and simulators in robotic surgery education is paramount. However, further work to ensure proper access to simulation resources for residents is necessary. While most recognize that bedside-assist skills are essential, most think its educational value plateaus quickly. Lastly, residents believe that earlier exposure to robotic surgery is necessary and that almost every case has a portion that is level-appropriate for residents to perform on the robot. CONCLUSIONS: As robotic surgery transitions from novelty to ubiquity, the importance of effective general surgery robotic surgery training during residency is paramount. Through in-depth interviews, this study provides examples of effective educational tools and techniques, highlights the importance of simulation, and explores opinions regarding the role of the resident in robotic surgery education. We hope the insights gained from this study can be used to develop and/or refine robotic surgery curricula.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Cirujanos/psicología , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepción , Investigación Cualitativa , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/psicología , Entrenamiento Simulado , Cirujanos/educación
6.
World J Surg ; 39(2): 487-92, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25322698

RESUMEN

The incidence of cancer in choledochal cysts (CCs) in adults was calculated to determine the timing and need for surgery. In 78 publications (1996-2010), 434 of 5780 reported CCs patients had cancer. Cholangiocarcinoma (70.4 %) and gallbladder cancer (23.5 %) were the most common malignancies. Only nine malignancies were reported before age 18 (0.42 %). In contrast, the incidence of malignancy in adults was 11.4 %. The median age for diagnosis of cancer was 42 years, and the incidence increased with each decade.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/epidemiología , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Colangiocarcinoma/epidemiología , Quiste del Colédoco/epidemiología , Quiste del Colédoco/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Quiste del Colédoco/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Humanos , Incidencia
7.
J Clin Med ; 13(3)2024 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337475

RESUMEN

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the recommended treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of TNT is debated: induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (chemoradiation first)? We aim to evaluate the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy with either induction or consolidation regiments in the United States for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database for patients with clinical stage II or stage III rectal cancer, diagnosed between 2006 and 2017, who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2017, we identified 8999 patients and found that the utilization of induction chemotherapy increased from 2.0% to 35.0%. TNT resulted in pathologic downstaging 46.7% of the time and a pathologic complete response 11.6% of the time. Induction chemotherapy lead to higher pathologic downstaging (58% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001) and pathologic complete responses (16.8% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Similar trends held true in a multivariate analysis and subset analysis of stage II and III disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that induction chemotherapy may be preferred over consolidation chemotherapy when downstaging prior to oncologic resection is desired. The optimal treatment plan for total neoadjuvant therapy is multi-factorial and requires further elucidation.

8.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(7): 1445-1453, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting (AFG) has shown promise in the treatment of complex wounds, with trials reporting good healing rates and safety profile. We aim to investigate the role of AFG in managing complex anorectal fistulas. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database. We examined the rates of symptom improvement, clinical closure of fistula tracts, recurrence, complications, and worsening fecal incontinence. Perianal disease activity index (PDAI) was obtained for patients undergoing combination of AFG and fistula plug treatment. RESULTS: In total, 52 unique patients underwent 81 procedures, of which Crohn's was present in 34 (65.4%) patients. The majority of patients previously underwent more common treatments such as endorectal advancement flap or ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. Fat-harvesting sites and processing technique were selected by the plastic surgeons based on availability of trunk fat deposits. When analyzing patients by their last procedure, 41 (80.4%) experienced symptom improvement, and 29 (64.4%) experienced clinical closure of all fistula tracts. Recurrence rate was 40.4%, and complication rate was 15.4% (7 postoperative abscesses requiring I&D and 1 bleeding episode ligated at bedside). The abdomen was the most common site of lipoaspirate harvest at 63%, but extremities were occasionally used. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes when comparing single graft treatment to multiple treatments, Crohn's and non-Crohn's, different methods of fat preparation, and diversion. CONCLUSION: AFG is a versatile procedure that can be done in conjunction with other therapies and does not interfere with future treatments if recurrence occurs. It is a promising and affordable method to safely address complex fistulas.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Incontinencia Fecal , Fístula Rectal , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Ligadura/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Inflamación , Tejido Adiposo , Canal Anal/cirugía , Recurrencia
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 25(2): 484-491, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors comprise 20% of neuroendocrine tumors in the alimentary tract, but there is controversy surrounding the optimal management of this disease. The purpose of this study is to better define treatment for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors between 2004 and 2015. Patients with metastatic disease and missing treatment data were excluded. We examined overall survival stratified by tumor size, treatment type, and presence of positive lymph nodes using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression model was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival. RESULTS: In total, 17,448 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors were identified; 16,531 of these patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients had tumors ≤ 10 mm (9216 patients, 79.8%), and approximately 90% underwent local excision. The probability of 5-year overall survival was significantly higher for patients with smaller tumors (≤ 10 mm: 94.1% 11-20 mm: 85.7%, > 20 mm: 71.8%; p < 0.001) and those with no positive lymph nodes (91.4% versus 53.3%, p < 0.001). The probability of 5-year overall survival differed based on treatment modality (local excision: 93.6%, radical resection: 79.1%, observation alone: 77.1%; p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, when compared to local excision, radical resection was not associated with a difference in overall survival but observation alone was associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 2.750, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in overall survival between patients who underwent local excision versus observation alone. Excision of the tumor should be offered to all patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who are appropriate surgical candidates, regardless of the tumor size.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
ANZ J Surg ; 90(12): E154-E162, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32808432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rectum is a common site for neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis of these tumours has been increasing in recent years, highlighting the need to better define treatment options for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumours (rNETs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014) to compare overall survival (OS) between local excision (LE) and radical resection (RR). To minimize bias, we performed three propensity score-matched comparisons stratified by tumour size: <10 mm, 10-20 mm, >20 mm. We compared OS by Kaplan-Meier analysis. We also examined margin status and postoperative outcomes for each comparison. RESULTS: A total of 12 996 patients underwent surgical treatment for rNET. There was no significant difference in probability of 10-year OS between LE and RR for patients with tumours <10 mm (88.6% versus 83.8%, P = 0.631, respectively) and tumours 10-20 mm (69.5% versus 69.3%, P = 0.226, respectively). In patients with tumours >20 mm, probability of 10-year OS was significantly longer in the LE group (76.5% versus 37.0%, P < 0.001). For all tumour sizes <10 mm and >20 mm, RR had significantly higher rates of 30-day readmission and negative margins. In subset analysis, there was no difference in OS for patients with positive margins after LE versus negative margins after RR for all tumour size groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that LE is a reasonable treatment option in patients with rNETs, especially for patients with high perioperative risk. Limitations to this study include its retrospective nature and inability to analyse surgeon decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Puntaje de Propensión , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Surg Educ ; 77(2): 461-471, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31558428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine barriers associated with the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon for general surgery residents in the era of robotic surgery in general surgery training. DESIGN: Qualitative thematic analysis using one-on-one interviews of general surgery residents and attendings conducted between June 2018 and February 2019. SETTING: An urban, academic, multihospital general surgery residency program with a robust robotic surgery program. PARTICIPANTS: Convenient and purposeful sampling was performed to ensure a variety of resident graduate-years and attending subspecialties were represented. Sample size was determined by data saturation, which occurred after 20 resident and 7 attending interviews. RESULTS: Residents identified the low volume of general surgery robotic cases, the infrequency of exposure to robotic surgery, and attending comfort with robotic surgery (and with teaching on the robot) as potential barriers in the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Residents had to find a replacement bedside assistant in order to be the console surgeon, which was challenging. In addition, residents felt that the current culture surrounding robotic surgery is very hierarchal, limiting their exposure. Attendings' trust in the residents' console skills was a major determining factor in allowing residents on the console. CONCLUSIONS: Most robotic surgery education curricula are sequential, requiring the resident to progress from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Unfortunately, there are many potential barriers for residents in the transition from bedside assistant to console surgeon. Some barriers apply to general surgery training overall, but are amplified in robotic surgery, while others are unique to robotic surgery education. Recognition of, and rectifying, these barriers may increase resident participation as the console surgeon.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Cirujanos , Curriculum , Humanos
12.
Int J Surg Oncol ; 2013: 309439, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23476758

RESUMEN

It is not always possible to evaluate patients that present acutely with carcinoma of the colon and rectum for synchronous lesions. Patients that require emergent surgery necessitate urgent and efficient operation. Patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or obstruction represent a challenging subset of patients with colorectal cancer. An organized approach to these patients in the effort not to overlook a synchronous carcinoma is important. The present paper provides an evidenced-based approach to this special situation.

13.
Am J Surg ; 200(2): 265-9, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20122681

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are few studies that compare the incidence of incisional hernia following elective laparoscopic colon resection to open colectomy and determine the risk factors for its development. METHODS: Elective open and laparoscopic colon resections performed between February 2002 and May 2007 were reviewed. In the laparoscopic group, mesenteric transection was performed via intracorporeal division for left-sided colectomy and via extracorporeal technique for right-sided colectomy. The ileocolic anastomosis was performed by extracorporeal stapling for right colectomies and by intracorporeal for left colectomies. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen patients (mean age 62 years, 52% male) underwent elective colon resection (50% open, 5% hand-assisted, and 45% laparoscopic). Six percent of the cases that started as laparoscopic were converted and are included in the open group. Mean follow-up was 26 months. The overall incisional hernia rate was 16% (open and minimally invasive group 17% vs 15%, P = .14). Hernia was not dependent on the type of resection, indication, or extraction site. Body mass index >36 kg/m(2), male gender, and surgical site infection were risk factors for hernia development. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colectomy does not reduce the development of incisional hernia.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Hernia Ventral/epidemiología , Anciano , Colectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA