Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 37(5): 318-327, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132202

RESUMEN

Endoscopic colorectal stenting has gained momentum over the last two decades as a viable alternative to surgical intervention in a subgroup of patients with colorectal disease. Stenting can be used as a temporizing bridge to surgical intervention or as a definitive treatment measure. Patient selection and the technical expertise of the endoscopist are of paramount importance to optimize the clinical outcome. Technical skills in therapeutic endoscopy and the choice of proper equipment including the consumables are required for the conduct of a safe and successful procedure. In this article, we share the lessons learned from a two-decade journey of the senior author with therapeutic endoscopy.

2.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 33(5): 279-286, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32968363

RESUMEN

Endoscopic stenting of the colorectum has emerged as a viable alternative to surgical interventions in a selected group of patients. The main indication for stenting is bowel obstruction. As such stenting can be used to palliate patients with metastatic disease or bridge patients to surgical intervention. The main advantages of stenting in the emergency setting include lower morbidity and mortality, lower incidence of stoma formation, shorter hospitalization, and better quality of life. For patients with unresectable disease and short life expectancy, stenting can be considered. However, for patients with longer life expectancy, the potential long-term complications of a metal stent such as erosion, migration, or obstruction have engendered debate whether such patients are better served by operative intervention. Stenting as a bridge to surgery is an alternative to surgery in patients who are high risk for emergency surgery but concerns remain regarding its impact on oncologic outcome in potentially curable patients.

3.
Ann Surg ; 269(4): 589-595, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080730

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence after the treatment of patients with rectal cancer with open (OPEN) or laparoscopic (LAP) resection. BACKGROUND: This randomized clinical trial (ACOSOG [Alliance] Z6051), performed between 2008 and 2013, compared LAP and OPEN resection of stage II/III rectal cancer, within 12 cm of the anal verge (T1-3, N0-2, M0) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The rectum and mesorectum were resected using open instruments for rectal dissection (included hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic) or with laparoscopic instruments under pneumoperitoneum. The 2-year DFS and recurrence were secondary endpoints of Z6051. METHODS: The DFS and recurrence were not powered, and are being assessed for superiority. Recurrence was determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, and every 6 months thereafter, using carcinoembryonic antigen, physical examination, computed tomography, and colonoscopy. In all, 486 patients were randomized to LAP (243) or OPEN (243), with 462 eligible for analysis (LAP = 240 and OPEN = 222). Median follow-up is 47.9 months. RESULTS: The 2-year DFS was LAP 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4-84.9) and OPEN 83.2% (95% CI 78.3-88.3). Local and regional recurrence was 4.6% LAP and 4.5% OPEN. Distant recurrence was 14.6% LAP and 16.7% OPEN.Disease-free survival was impacted by unsuccessful resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.21-2.91): composite of incomplete specimen (HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.85-3.18); positive circumferential resection margins (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.40-3.79); positive distal margin (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.30-3.77). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic assisted resection of rectal cancer was not found to be significantly different to OPEN resection of rectal cancer based on the outcomes of DFS and recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto/patología
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 34(1): 47-54, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30244347

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of expectant management surveillance for patients at risk for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). METHODS: Adult patients at risk for anal cancer, specifically those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or known human papilloma virus (HPV) infections (anal dysplasia, anogenital warts, cervical dysplasia, or cervical cancer), underwent expectant management surveillance with targeted therapy of only grossly abnormal or symptomatic anoderm lesions. A retrospective analysis investigated the SCCA incidence in these surveilled populations and in the general population patients without known HIV or HPV infection. RESULTS: There were 452 incident SCCA in a population of 5,978,510 patients (mean follow-up per patient of 5.4 years). Four hundred ten cancers (90.7%) developed in 5,750,501 HIV-negative patients without documented history of HPV infection (cumulative incidence 0.007%). In at-risk patient populations, the cumulative incidence was 0.69% in patients with anal dysplasia (6 out of 872 patients), 0.14% in HIV+ patients (8 out of 5626 patients), and less than 0.1% in the remaining at-risk groups: cervical cancer (1 out of 1168 patients), cervical dysplasia (14 out of 125,604 patients), and genital warts (14 out of 94,739 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Expectant management surveillance, with targeted treatment for symptomatic or abnormal lesions, is an effective strategy for the diagnosis of anal cancer in at-risk patient populations. In this study, most patients who developed anal cancer had no known risk factors. A screening strategy for the general population needs to be further delineated.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Atención a la Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Surg Endosc ; 32(7): 3114-3121, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29362906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Need for colon sparing interventions for premalignant lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic excision has stimulated interest in advanced endoscopic approaches. The aim of this study was to report a single institution's experience with these techniques. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively collected database of all patients referred between 2011 and 2015 for colorectal resection of benign appearing deemed endoscopically unresectable by conventional endoscopic techniques. Patients were counseled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with possible combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) or alternatively colorectal resection if unable to resect endoscopically or suspicion for cancer. Lesion characteristic, resection rate, complications, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: 110 patients were analyzed [mean age 64 years, female gender 55 (50%), median body mass index 29.4 kg/m2]. Indications for interventions were large polyp median endoscopic size 3 cm (range 1.5-6.5) and/or difficult location [cecum (34.9%), ascending colon (22.7%), transverse colon (14.5%), hepatic flexure (11.8%), descending colon (6.3%), sigmoid colon (3.6%), rectum (3.6%), and splenic flexure (2.6%)]. Lesion morphology was sessile (N = 98, 93%) and pedunculated (N = 12, 7%). Successful endoscopic resection rate was 88.2% (N = 97): ESD in 69 patients and CELS in 28 patients. Complication rate was 11.8% (13/110) [delayed bleeding (N = 4), perforation (N = 3), organ-space surgical site infection (SSI) (N = 2), superficial SSI (N = 1), and postoperative ileus (N = 3)]. Out of 110 patients, 13 patients (11.8%) required colectomy for technical failure (7 patients) or carcinoma (6 patients). During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 6-41 months), 2 patients had adenoma recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced endoscopic surgery appears to be a safe and effective alternative to colectomy for patients with complex premalignant lesions deemed unresectable with conventional endoscopic techniques.


Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Colectomía/métodos , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Resección Endoscópica de la Mucosa/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Colon Sigmoide/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Surg Endosc ; 32(7): 3290-3294, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29344786

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy in patients with diverticulosis can be technically challenging and limited data exist relating to the risk of post-colonoscopy diverticulitis. Our aim was to evaluate the incidence, management, and outcomes of acute diverticulitis following colonoscopy. METHODS: Study design is retrospective cohort study. Data were gathered by conducting an automated search of the electronic patient database using current procedural terminology and ICD-9 codes. Patients who underwent a colonoscopy from 2003 to 2012 were reviewed to find patients who developed acute diverticulitis within 30 days after colonoscopy. Patient demographics and colonoscopy-related outcomes were documented, which include interval between colonoscopy and diverticulitis, colonoscopy indication, simultaneous colonoscopic interventions, and follow-up after colonoscopy. RESULTS: From 236,377 colonoscopies performed during the study period, 68 patients (mean age 56 years) developed post-colonoscopy diverticulitis (0.029%; 2.9 per 10,000 colonoscopies). Incomplete colonoscopies were more frequent among patients with a history of previous diverticulitis [n = 10 (29%) vs. n = 3 (9%), p = 0.03]. Mean time to develop diverticulitis after colonoscopy was 12 ± 8 days, and 30 (44%) patients required hospitalization. 34 (50%) patients had a history of diverticulitis prior to colonoscopy. Among those patients, 14 underwent colonoscopy with an indication of surveillance for previous disease. When colonoscopy was performed within 6 weeks of a diverticulitis attack, surgical intervention was required more often when compared with colonoscopies performed after 6 weeks of an acute attack [n = 6 (100%) vs. n = 10 (36%), p = 0.006]. 6 (9%) out of 68 patients received emergency surgical treatment. 15 (24%) out of 62 patients who had non-surgical treatment initially underwent an elective sigmoidectomy at a later date. Recurrent diverticulitis developed in 16 (23%) patients after post-colonoscopy diverticulitis. CONCLUSIONS: Post-colonoscopy diverticulitis is a rare, but potentially serious complication. Although a rare entity, possibility of this complication should be kept in mind in patients presenting with symptoms after colonoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Diverticulitis del Colon/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Diverticulitis del Colon/epidemiología , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 60(5): 527-536, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28383453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery have increasingly become under scrutiny by accounting for the largest fraction of geriatric postoperative deaths and a significant proportion of all postoperative complications, including anastomotic leak. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine predictors of anastomotic leak in elderly patients undergoing colectomy by creating a novel nomogram for simplistic prediction of anastomotic leak risk in a given patient. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The database review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was conducted at a single institution. PATIENTS: Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective segmental colectomy with an anastomosis at different levels (abdominal or low pelvic) in 2012-2013 were identified from the multi-institutional procedure-targeted database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We constructed a stepwise multiple logistic regression model for anastomotic leak as an outcome; predictors were selected in a stepwise fashion using the Akaike information criterion. The validity of the nomogram was externally tested on elderly patients (≥65 years of age) from the 2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy-targeted database. RESULTS: A total of 10,392 patients were analyzed, and anastomotic leak occurred in 332 (3.2%). Of the patients who developed anastomotic leak, 192 (57.8%) were men (p < 0.001). Based on unadjusted analysis, factors associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak were ASA score III and IV (p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003), smoking history (p = 0.014), weight loss (p = 0.013), previously infected wound (p = 0.005), omitting mechanical bowel preparation (p = 0.005) and/or preoperative oral antibiotic use (p < 0.001), and wounds classified as contaminated or dirty/infected (p = 0.008). Patients who developed anastomotic leak had a longer length of hospital stay (17 vs 7 d; p < 0.001) and operative time (191 vs 162 min; p < 0.001). A multivariate model and nomogram were created. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and short-term follow-up (30 d). CONCLUSIONS: An accurate prediction of anastomotic leak affecting morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery using the proposed nomogram may facilitate decision making in elderly patients for healthcare providers.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica , Colectomía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Cirugía Colorrectal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Cirugía Colorrectal/mortalidad , Cirugía Colorrectal/normas , Cirugía Colorrectal/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Nomogramas , Ohio/epidemiología , Tempo Operativo , Pronóstico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(3): 375-382, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27817034

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Endoscopic stenting is used with increasing frequency to treat colorectal conditions. Little is known about what influences outcome. This study aimed to determine the impact of various factors on the short- and long-term results of colorectal stenting. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all endoscopic stenting procedures performed by a colorectal surgeon at a tertiary referral institution between 2003 and 2013. Main outcome measures included technical success, clinical success, complications, and predictors of outcome. RESULTS: Of the stent procedures, 183 were performed in 165 patients. The majority of patients (90 %) presented with a malignant obstruction (intrinsic colonic vs. extrinsic non-colonic). Carcinomatosis was present in 22 % of patients with malignancy, and it was associated with lower technical success compared to non-carcinomatosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.2 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.8]; p = 0.021). Colonic malignancy was associated with higher clinical success compared to non-colonic malignancy (AOR 3.8 [95 % CI 1.4-10.3]; p = 0.009). Carcinomatosis increased the risk of complications compared to non-carcinomatosis (AOR 3.2 [95 % CI 1.0-10.0]; p = 0.049). The risk of complication was higher when a stent was deployed in the rectum compared to the colon (AOR 4.1 [95 % CI 1.5-11.7]; p = 0.008). The use of a covered stent was associated with higher complication rate compared to a non-covered stent (AOR 13.6 [95 % CI 2.6-71.2]; p = 0.002). Balloon dilation was associated with an increased risk of complications (AOR 4.6 [95 % CI 1.3-16.2]; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Carcinomatosis was associated with lower technical success rate. Clinical success was higher in patients with a primary colonic malignancy. The use of a covered stent, balloon dilation of stricture, lesions in the rectum, and carcinomatosis were associated with higher risk for complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Endoscopía , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pronóstico , Stents/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 32(4): 469-474, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27915373

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of various factors on 30-day postoperative morbidity in patients who underwent colorectal surgery (CRS) for colovesical fistula (CVF) in the elective and emergency settings. METHODS: Patients who underwent CRS for CVF between 2005 and 2013 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database by using current procedural terminology codes. Demographics, perioperative, and operative factors were assessed and compared between two groups classified according to the presence or absence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Five hundred twelve patients met the inclusion criteria [mean age of 61.4 (±14.7) years, female 214 (42%)]. Etiology of fistula was diverticulitis [N = 438 (85.5%)], colon cancer [N = 39 (7.6%)], and Crohn's disease [N = 35 (6.8%)]. One hundred fifty-two procedures (29.7%) were performed laparoscopically. In 186 patients (36%), no bladder intervention was performed. One hundred forty-nine patients (29.1%) had at least one postoperative complication. Patients who developed complication were older (P = <0.001), more often female (P = <0.001), hypertensive (P = 0.005), anemic (P = <0.001), preoperatively transfused (P = 0.02), and with class 2-3 wound classification (P = 0.01). Independent risk factors affecting morbidity were increased age [odds ratio (OR) 1.23 (1.03-1.47), P = 0.01], decreased hematocrit level [OR 3.04(1.83-5.06), P < 0.0001], and open approach [OR 2.56 (1.35-4.84), P = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity for CVF remains high. Lower preoperative hematocrit level and increased age were associated with higher risk of complication. Laparoscopic surgery may be preferable when possible as morbidity is less with this approach.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Fístula Intestinal/complicaciones , Fístula Intestinal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 31(1): 29-34, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26260479

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Perianal Paget's disease is a rare intraepithelial adenocarcinoma of the perianal skin and the second most common localization of extramammary Paget's disease. This study was designed to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients with perianal Paget's disease. METHODS: We identified patients who were treated for perianal Paget's disease between 1981 and 2013. Patient demographics, family history, associated malignancies, treatments, histopathological features, need for re-operations, and long-term outcomes were documented. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 15 male and 10 female patients with a median age of 67 (40-83) years. Four patients had concurrent anorectal adenocarcinoma (two anal canal, two rectal) when perianal Paget's disease was diagnosed. Index operations performed were wide local excision (14 patients), local excision (five patients), abdominoperineal resection (four patients), and radiotherapy (two patients). Five patients developed invasive carcinoma (three anal canal, one vulvar, one perianal squamous cell carcinoma) during a median follow-up time of 60 (3-299) months. Thirteen patients were re-operated. Fifteen patients had a reconstructive procedure following excision. Overall survival was similar between the patients who were treated with wide local excision and local excision regardless of surgical margin status at index excision (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Since there is a risk for developing invasive carcinoma in the anal canal and perineum in patients with perianal Paget's disease, close follow-up is needed after R0 or R1 excision. Physicians should be aware of the risk of cancers associated with perianal Paget's disease and should rule out them during management.


Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/patología , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canal Anal/cirugía , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/cirugía , Perineo/patología , Perineo/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Análisis de Supervivencia
12.
Ann Surg ; 262(6): 891-8, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26473651

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of positive circumferential resection margin following rectal cancer resection in the United States. BACKGROUND: Positive circumferential resection margin is associated with a high rate of local recurrence and poor morbidity and mortality for rectal cancer patients. Prior study has shown poor compliance with national rectal cancer guidelines, but whether this finding is reflected in patient outcomes has yet to be shown. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection for stage I-III rectal cancer were identified from the 2010-2011 National Cancer Database. The primary outcome was a positive circumferential resection margin. The relationship between patient, hospital, tumor, and treatment-related characteristics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A positive circumferential resection margin was noted in 2859 (17.2%) of the 16,619 patients included. Facility location, clinical T and N stage, histologic type, tumor size, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, type of operation, and operative approach were significant predictors of positive circumferential resection margin on multivariable analysis. Total proctectomy had nearly a 30% increased risk of positive margin compared with partial proctectomy (OR 1.293, 95%CI 1.185-1.411) and a laparoscopic approach had nearly 22% less risk of a positive circumferential resection margin compared with an open approach (OR 0.882, 95%CI 0.790-0.985). CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in surgical technique and multimodality therapy, rates of positive circumferential resection margin remain high in the United States. Several tumor and treatment characteristics were identified as independent risk factors, and advances in rectal cancer care are necessary to approach the outcomes seen in other countries.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/patología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
13.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(5): 631-8, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25808012

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of an algorithm-based multidisciplinary treatment approach to rectourethral fistula. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database at a tertiary center of all consecutive patients treated between 2003 and 2013. RESULTS: Thirty males (mean age 63 years) were reviewed. Prostate cancer treatment was the most common fistula etiology (97%). Urinary drainage consisted of urethral catheter in all patients and suprapubic catheter in 14 (47%). The rate of fecal diversion was 67%. During a mean follow-up of 72 months, healing rate was 90% and recurrence rate 0%. Spontaneous healing was achieved in 14 patients (47%): 8 (27%) without fecal diversion and 6 (20%) following fecal diversion. Thirteen patients (43%) required definitive intervention. The majority of operated patients underwent transanal or transperineal flap (endorectal, dartos, or gracilis) successfully. Only 2 patients (7%) required an abdominal approach (positive oncologic margins or non-functioning bladder). Fifteen out of the 20 patients (75%) who underwent fecal diversion had stoma closure with an overall permanent stoma rate of 17%. Long-term urinary incontinence was noted in 11 patients (37%). Six patients (20%) required permanent urinary diversion or drainage catheters. CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm-based treatment approach for rectourethral fistula is useful in the management of this rare condition. Selective fecal diversion is possible, and majority of patients who require definitive intervention can be treated with a transanal or transperineal approach. The rate of permanent stoma is low, but long-term urinary dysfunction is frequent.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Enfermedades Uretrales/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Fístula Urinaria/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Criocirugía/métodos , Cistoscopía/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endosonografía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Proctoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades Raras , Fístula Rectal/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Uretrales/diagnóstico , Fístula Urinaria/diagnóstico
14.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 400(4): 505-12, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25876737

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of incisional ventral hernia and small bowel obstruction following laparoscopic and open colorectal resection. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of a large database comprising 13 hospitals, serving 3.6 million patients in Southern California. Patients 18 years and older undergoing elective colorectal resection over a 3-year period were included. The crude incidence rates were calculated, and relative risks of ventral hernia and small bowel obstruction were determined using multivariable proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred and thirteen patients underwent 4765 colorectal resections between August 2008 and August 2011. Fifty-nine percent of the cases were performed laparoscopically; the median age was 63 years, and 49% were males. Colorectal carcinoma (45%) and diverticulitis (18%) were the most common indications for surgery. The median follow-up was 2.4 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates of ventral hernia at 1, 2, and 3 years among the open cohort were significantly higher at 10.1, 17.0, and 20.5%, compared to 5.7, 8.7, and 10.8% in the laparoscopic cohort (p < 0.001). Similarly, small bowel obstruction was higher in the open compared to the laparoscopic group (open 10.4, 15.0, and 18.3% vs. laparoscopic 2.7, 4.4, and 5.5%, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection were less likely to develop ventral hernia [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.64 (95% CI 0.52, 0.80); p < 0.0001] and small bowel obstruction [AHR 0.41 (95% CI 0.31, 0.54); p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of incisional ventral hernia and small bowel obstruction is significantly reduced in patients who undergo laparoscopic compared to open colorectal resection.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Hernia Ventral/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 55(5): 605-10, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22513440

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of the radiofrequency treatment for moderate to severe fecal incontinence. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of a single-institution experience. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent the radiofrequency procedure were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the complication rate, short- and long-term response, and the rate of subsequent intervention for incontinence. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients underwent 31 radiofrequency procedures (81% women; mean age, 64 years). Median length of symptoms was 3 years. Biofeedback had failed for 52% of patients, and 23% of patients had previous surgical intervention. Thirty-eight percent of patients had a sphincter defect. Minor complications were observed in 19% of the patients. A treatment response was noted in 78% of the patients (mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score: 16 (baseline) and 10.9 (3 months postoperatively)). However, a sustained long-term response without any additional intervention was noted in 22% of the patients, and 52% of the patients underwent or are awaiting additional intervention for persistent or recurrent incontinence (mean follow-up, 40 months). LIMITATION: This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the limited number of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The radiofrequency procedure was safe, but a long-term benefit was noted in a minority of patients with moderate to severe fecal incontinence. Additional interventions were required in more than half of the patients. Larger studies are needed to determine the impact of various patient-related factors on the outcome of the radiofrequency treatment to identify the ideal patient for this therapy.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Incontinencia Fecal/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Defecación , Incontinencia Fecal/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 55(2): 167-74, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22228160

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the morbidity of a defunctioning loop ileostomy and the subsequent closure rate, and to identify the predictors of complications and nonclosure of stoma. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of a single-institution experience. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent a planned temporary defunctioning loop ileostomy performed synchronously with a pelvic anastomosis during a 6-year period were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the ileostomy complication rate for the entire spectrum of care, readmission and reoperation rates to treat ileostomy complications, and subsequent closure rate. Patient and treatment factors were evaluated for their independent effect on complications and closure rate with the use of multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were identified (median age, 51 years). Of these patients, 64.2% developed ≥1 minor or major ileostomy complications (13.8% during index hospitalization, 52.8% as outpatient, and 23.4% after closure). Readmitted for dehydration following ileostomy formation were 11.4% of patients. The ileostomy was closed in 76.4% of patients with 8.6% requiring a midline laparotomy. The overall ileostomy-related reoperation rate was 10.4% (2.4% during index hospitalization, 1.6% at readmission, and 6.4% following ileostomy closure). Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m) was associated with a higher overall ileostomy complication rate (OR 8.56, 95% CI 1.64-44.74) and outpatient complication rate (OR 7.69, 95% CI 2.48-23.81). Age >65 years (OR 53.34, 95% CI 4.21-676.14) and hypertension (OR 8.36, 95% CI 1.09-64.43) increased the risks of high ileostomy output and dehydration. Obesity (OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.14-18.54) and smoking (4.47, 95% CI 1.43-13.98) decreased the likelihood of ileostomy closure. LIMITATION: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity of a defunctioning loop ileostomy remains significant. Obesity is an independent predictor of ileostomy complications. Older age and hypertension increase the risks of high-output stoma and dehydration. Almost one quarter of patients never have the ileostomy closed. Obesity and smoking are associated with less likelihood of a subsequent ileostomy closure.


Asunto(s)
Ileostomía/métodos , Íleon/cirugía , Intestino Grueso/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Técnicas de Cierre de Heridas , Adulto Joven
18.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 54(6): 686-92, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21552052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Defecography is the gold standard for assessing functional anorectal disorders but is limited by the need for a specific radiologic environment, exposure of patients to radiation, and inability to show all anatomic structures involved in defecation. Echodefecography is a 3-dimensional dynamic ultrasound technique developed to overcome these limitations. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to validate the effectiveness of echodefecography compared with defecography in the assessment of anorectal dysfunctions related to obstructed defecation. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective observational study. PATIENTS: Women with symptoms of obstructed defecation. SETTING: Six centers for colorectal surgery (3 in Brazil, 1 in Texas, 1 in Florida, and 1 in Venezuela). INTERVENTIONS: Defecography was performed after inserting 150 mL of barium paste in the rectum. Echodefecography was performed with a 2050 endoprobe through 3 automatic scans. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The κ statistic was used to assess agreement between echodefecography and defecography in the evaluation of rectocele, intussusception, anismus, and grade III enterocele. RESULTS: Eighty-six women were evaluated: median Wexner constipation score, 13.4 (range, 6-23); median age, 53.4 (range, 26-77) years. Rectocele was identified with substantial agreement between the 2 methods (defecography, 80 patients; echodefecography, 76 patients; κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.48-0.73). The 2 techniques demonstrated identical findings in 6 patients without rectocele, and in 9 patients with grade I, 29 with grade II, and 19 patients with grade III rectoceles. Defecography identified rectal intussusception in 42 patients, with echodefecography identifying 37 of these cases, plus 4 additional cases, yielding substantial agreement (κ = 0.79; 95% CI = 0.57-1.0). Intussusception was associated with rectocele in 28 patients for both methods (κ = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.41-0.83). There was substantial agreement for anismus (κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40-0.81) and for rectocele combined with anismus (κ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.40-0.82). Agreement for grade III enterocele was classified as almost perfect (κ = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.66-1.0). LIMITATIONS: Echodefecography had limited use in identification of grade I and II enteroceles because of the type of probe used. CONCLUSIONS: Echodefecography may be used to assess patients with obstructed defecation, as it is able to detect the same anorectal dysfunctions found by defecography. It is minimally invasive and well tolerated, avoids exposure to radiation, and clearly demonstrates all the anatomic structures involved in defecation.


Asunto(s)
Estreñimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Defecografía/métodos , Endosonografía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Canal Anal/diagnóstico por imagen , Canal Anal/fisiopatología , Sulfato de Bario , Estreñimiento/fisiopatología , Medios de Contraste , Enema , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Intususcepción/diagnóstico por imagen , Intususcepción/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Rectocele/diagnóstico por imagen , Rectocele/fisiopatología
19.
Tech Coloproctol ; 15(3): 313-8, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21744097

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of patients with Buschke-Löwenstein tumor or circumferential anal carcinoma in situ who underwent wide local excision with flap or skin graft coverage of the wound. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients operated at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center during a 6-year period. Outcome measures included postoperative complications, functional results, recurrence rate, and re-intervention rate. RESULTS: Of 152 patients operated for dysplastic anal lesions or tumors, 10 (7%) underwent wide local excision for Buschke-Löwenstein tumor or circumferential anal carcinoma in situ [men 70%, mean age 36 years]. Median duration of symptoms was 5 years. Eighty percent of patients had prior operations and 50% were positive for the human immunodeficiency virus. Mean size of the lesion was 41 cm(2). Microscopic margin positivity was noted in 60%. Wound was closed with house advancement flap in majority of patients. Only one patient had fecal diversion. Median length of stay was 2 days. Postoperative complications were noted in 50% of patients. Rate of transient postoperative incontinence was 30%. Recurrent disease was noted in 3 patients with the human immunodeficiency virus [median follow-up: 18 months]. All recurrences were treated with local fulguration or medication. CONCLUSION: Wide local excision with flap or skin graft coverage is an option for patients with Buschke-Löwenstein tumor or circumferential anal carcinoma in situ. Close postoperative surveillance is advised due to the risk of recurrent disease, especially in patients with the human immunodeficiency virus.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Condiloma Acuminado/cirugía , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Ano/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma in Situ/complicaciones , Carcinoma in Situ/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Condiloma Acuminado/complicaciones , Condiloma Acuminado/patología , Femenino , Seropositividad para VIH/complicaciones , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante de Piel , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Adulto Joven
20.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 53(12): 1699-707, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21178867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical course of diverticular disease in immunosuppressed patients is widely believed to be more severe than in the general population. In this study we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the epidemiology and clinical course of diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients. Our goal was to develop recommendations regarding the care of this group of patients. METHODS: Using PubMed and Web of Knowledge we systematically reviewed all studies published between 1970 and 2009 that analyzed the epidemiology, clinical manifestation, or outcomes of treatment of diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients. Keywords of "transplantation," "corticosteroid," "HIV," "AIDS," and "chemotherapy" were used. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. All of these studies focused on the impact of diverticulitis in patients with transplants or on chronic corticosteroid therapy. The reported incidence of acute diverticulitis in these patients was approximately 1% (variable follow-up periods). Among patients with known diverticular disease the incidence was 8%. Mortality from acute diverticulitis in these patients was 23% when treated surgically and 56% when treated medically. Overall mortality was 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study summarizes evidence that patients with transplants or patients on chronic corticosteroid therapy 1) have a rate of acute diverticulitis that is higher than the baseline population and 2) a mortality rate with acute diverticulitis that is high. Further research is needed to define whether these risks constitute a mandate for screening and prophylactic sigmoid colectomy.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Diverticulitis/etiología , Diverticulitis/inmunología , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Trasplante de Órganos , Diverticulitis/mortalidad , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA