Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio in coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and practice review.

Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are invasive methods to assess the functional significance of intermediate severity coronary lesions. Both indexes have been extensively validated in clinical trials in guiding revascularisation in patients with stable ischaemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with improved clinical outcomes. However, the role of these tools in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is less clear. Methods: A meta-analysis of randomised trials and observational studies was carried out to help in determining the optimal strategy for assessing lesion severity and selecting graft targets in patients undergoing CABG. Electronic searches were carried out on Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. A group of four authors independently screened and then assessed the retrieved records. Cochrane's Risk of Bias and Robins-I tools were used for bias assessment. A survey was conducted among surgeons and cardiologists to describe current attitudes towards the preoperative use of functional coronary investigations in practice. Results: Clinical outcomes including mortality at 30 days, perioperative myocardial infarction, number of grafts, incidence of stroke, rate of further need for revascularisation, and patient-reported quality of life did not differ in CABG guided by functional testing from those guided by traditional angiography.The survey revealed that in half of the surgical and cardiology units functional assessment is performed in CABG patients; there is a general perception that functional testing has improved patient care and its use would clarify the role of moderate coronary lesions that often need multidisciplinary rediscussions; moderate stenosis are felt to be clinically relevant; and anatomical considerations need to be taken into account together with functional assessment. Conclusions: At present, the evidence to support the routine use of functional testing in intermediate lesions for planning CABG is currently insufficient. The pooled data currently available do not show an increased risk in mortality, myocardial injury, and stroke in the FFR/iFR-guided group. Further trials with highly selected populations are needed to clarify the best strategy. Systematic Review Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (CRD42023414604).

Interventions to prevent and treat sarcopenia in a surgical population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the results of trials evaluating interventions for the reduction of sarcopenia in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Searches were conducted using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase. RCTs evaluating exercise, dietary or pharmacological interventions to address sarcopenia in the perioperative period were included. Treatment effect estimates were expressed as standardized mean differences (MDs) with confidence intervals, and heterogeneity was expressed as I2 values. RESULTS: Seventy trials including 3402 participants were selected for the data synthesis. Exercise interventions significantly increased muscle mass (MD 0.62, 95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 0.90; P < 0.001), muscle strength (MD 0.55, 0.39 to 0.71; P < 0.001), measures of gait speed (MD 0.42, 0.05 to 0.79; P = 0.03), and reduced time for completion of set exercises (MD -0.76, -1.12 to -0.40; P < 0.001) compared with controls. Subgroup analysis showed that interventions in the early postoperative period were more likely to have a positive effect on muscle mass (MD 0.71, 0.35 to 1.07; P < 0.001) and timed tests (MD -0.70, -1.10 to -0.30; P = 0.005) than preoperative interventions. Treatment effects on muscle mass (MD 0.09, -0.31 to 0.49; P = 0.66) and strength (MD 0.46, -0.01 to 0.92; P = 0.05) were attenuated by the presence of cancer. Results of analyses restricted to nine trials at low risk of allocation concealment bias and fourteen trials at low risk of attrition bias were comparable to those of the primary analysis. Risk-of-bias assessment showed that most trials were at high risk of incomplete outcome and attrition bias, thus reducing the estimate of certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE assessment tool. CONCLUSION: Exercise interventions appear beneficial in reducing the impact of sarcopenia. Because of the high risk of bias and low certainty of the current evidence, large RCTs using standardized measures of muscle mass should be undertaken.

Report of a Delphi exercise to inform the design of a research programme on screening for thoracic aortic disease.

OBJECTIVES: To inform the design of a clinical trial of a targeted screening programme for relatives of individuals affected by thoracic aortic disease, we performed a consensus exercise as to the acceptability of screening, the optimal sequence and choice of tests, long-term patient management, and choice of trial design. METHODS: Working with the Aortic Dissection Awareness UK & Ireland patient association, we performed a Delphi exercise with clinical experts, patients, and carers, consisting of three rounds of consultation followed by a final multi-stakeholder face-to-face workshop. RESULTS: Thirty-five experts and 84 members of the public took part in the surveys, with 164 patients and clinicians attending the final workshop. There was substantial agreement on the need for a targeted screening pathway that would employ a combined approach (imaging + genetic testing). The target population would include the first- and second-degree adult (> 15 years) relatives, with no upper age limit of affected patients. Disagreement persisted about the screening process, sequence, personnel, the imaging method to adopt, computed tomography (CT) scan vs magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the specifics of a potential trial, including willingness to undergo randomisation, and measures of effectiveness and acceptability. CONCLUSION: A Delphi process, initiated by patients, identified areas of uncertainty with respect to behaviour, process, and the design of a targeted screening programme for thoracic aortic disease that requires further research prior to any future trial.

Effects of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis.

The afterload increase imposed by severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) creates concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling and diastolic dysfunction (DD), which are both markers of poor clinical outcome. Ideally, a correctly timed surgery for isolated AS can reverse the LV remodeling. However, data on LV DD after aortic valve replacement (AVR) are sparse and contrasting. Aims of the study are to define the markers of a favorable evolution of the DD at follow-up. Patients with severe isolated AS, scheduled for AVR were prospectively enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography with DD assessment was performed before surgery, and at 12 months after surgery. Global LV longitudinal and circumferential strain, peak atrial longitudinal and contraction strain (PALS, PACS) were obtained at baseline. LV septal biopsy to assess fibrosis was performed at the time of AVR. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled, age 72 ± 8 years, 66% female, ejection fraction 61 ± 8%, E/e' 13 ± 6, PALS 23 ± 7%. Normal estimated left atrial pressure was detected in 19/67 (28%) versus 43/67 (64%) at follow-up (p <0.0001). In the 37 patients with biopsy available, fibrosis was 24 ± 12%. PALS and AS severity were correlated with LV fibrosis (R2 = 0.19; p = 0.006, and R2 = 0.15; p = 0.02, respectively). PALS (odds ratio: 1.19 [1.05 to 1.41], p = 0.02) and PACS (odds ratio: 1.24 [1.06 to 1.50], p = 0.006) were the only baseline noninvasive parameters independently associated with normal left atrial pressure at follow-up. Mean follow-up time was 791 ± 245 days, and 8 (12%) patients had cardiovascular events (death, hospital admission due to heart failure or ischemic disease, and onset of atrial fibrillation). Myocardial fibrosis (p = 0.05), baseline PALS (p = 0.004), and PACS (p = 0.03) were associated with cardiovascular events. In conclusion, LV diastolic function generally improves after AVR for severe AS. Baseline PALS, PACS, and LV fibrosis were related to the DD and clinical outcome at follow-up; these parameters might cue a better diastolic response to the afterload correction.

Is TAVI superior to surgery in high-risk patients? Insight into the concept of individual risk assessment.

The prevalence of aortic valve stenosis (AS) is growing in developed countries because its prevalence increases with age. A growing number of elderly patients are currently referred to specialized centres to be evaluated for potential therapeutic strategies. Indeed, two techniques are nowadays able to treat high-risk AS patients: TAVI and surgical replacement (AVR). It is the purpose of the present review to summarize current knowledge on safety and efficacy of AVR and TAVI in high-risk patients; to focus on some aspects of recently published guidelines; to emphasize the growing importance of pre-operative individual risk assessment, which is considered the real crucial point for patient selection and trial's comparisons. Indeed, it is worth of noting that currently adopted risk-scores do not show satisfactory performances. Accordingly, it becomes of utmost importance to investigate several baseline but still neglected patients' characteristics (e.g. frailty, functional status, co-morbid conditions, etc.), as well as their pathogenetic relationships with interventional results and follow-up prognosis. All these items are emphasized in the present review. Finally, we have tried to anticipate future scenarios in terms of both ongoing clinical trials and improvements of risk-scores.